Menu
Central banks around the world, including the Bank of England in the UK, have had to change the way they handle money because of the rise and widespread use of digital currencies. As more complex economic standards become more common and well known, it is important to fully understand how these standards might change the structure of traditional financial strategy.
Computerized monetary standards are forms of money that are not controlled by one group and instead work on a network of computers. Computerized money standards can be seen in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other similar currencies. Digital currencies are different from regular money, which is made and controlled by governments and central banks. Some digital currencies use blockchain technology and don't need middlemen to process transactions.
Central Bank Digital Currencies or CBDCs have the potential to offer a wide range of benefits; however, if they are not appropriately designed, they may produce results that were not intended, specifically in terms of monetary policy. The objectives of monetary policy and the operational structure for monetary policy will remain the same due to the issuance of a Central Bank Digital Currency by the respective Central banks.Central Bank Digital Currencies can potentially alter retail, wholesale and cross-border payment systems, which may have unfavorable repercussions for monetary policy. These systems include retail stores, wholesale markets, and international trade. This is because of their effect on a variety of factors, including the velocity of money, the disintermediation of bank deposits, the volatility of bank reserves, currency substitution, and capital flows. It can be also said that around about 20% of household and corporate deposits migrate to CBDC(Minesso, Mehl and Stracca 2022).Due to this reason, the given research can be considered to be relevant.
One of the essential ramifications of computerised monetary standards on the money-related approach of the National Bank of the UK is the expected interruption of the customary financial framework. Advanced economic measures empower shared exchanges without the requirement for conventional financial mediators. In its August Monetary Policy Report, the Committee updates its projections of activity and inflation. During the three-year forecast, Bank Rate is expected to rise to a peak of just over 6% and average just under 512%, compared with an average of just over 4% when the May Report was released. Around 4% more sterling is worth in the May Report (bankofengland.co.uk. 2023).
One more angle that the National Bank of the UK needs to consider is the potential for monetary insecurity emerging from the instability of computerised monetary standards. The worth of computerized monetary means can change, which could prompt expanded market unpredictability and likely monetary dangers. National banks might have to foster new systems and guidelines to address these difficulties and relieve the risks related to computerised monetary forms. Also, the ascent of computerized monetary forms raises worries about monetary incorporation and purchaser assurance (D’Orazio and Popoyan, 2022). While computerized monetary standards offer the potential for more noteworthy monetary consideration by giving admittance to monetary administrations to people who are unbanked or underbanked. The National Bank of the UK should work out a kind of harmony between advancing advancement and guaranteeing the steadiness and security of the monetary framework.
The aim of the given research is to identify the impact of digital currencies' monetary policies on Central Banks.
The research objectives are as follows:-
The research questions are as follows:-
The structure of the dissertation is as follows:-
Figure 1: Structure of the dissertation
There is a growing trend towards cashless transactions among consumers all over the globe, even though the physical currency is still widely used in most countries. This is demonstrated by the situation in Sweden, which is witnessing a steep decline in the use of currency. Credit cards and mobile phones are becoming increasingly popular alternatives for people to use when making financial transactions (Ozili 2023). There is a possibility that the Federal Reserve will follow through with a plan to implement a strategy that involves providing a significant negative interest rate on central bank digital currency. The CBDC would be taken out of people's digital wallets daily and sent as a contribution to the Federal Reserve
Carapella and Flemming (2020) argue that there is a possibility that the implementation of a CBDCwill result in two positive monetary policy outcomes. Given the hypothetical situation in which a CBDCcould facilitate negative interest rates and the discontinuation of paper currency, the most noteworthy aspect pertains to the possibility of interest rates being liberated from the zero lower bounds (ZLB). This is the most remarkable aspect because it relates to the case of interest rates being released from the ZLB. Consequently, the Federal Reserve can lower interest rates to any degree necessary in the event of a deflationary spiral. In addition, the introduction of a CBDCthat provides interest payments has the potential to increase the Federal Reserve's authority over interest rates. This is especially true if the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) tightens monetary policy by raising interest rates above the zero lower bounds. A CBDC that provides interest payments would be a form of a Central Bank Digital Currency. Lending practices would probably be influenced by the interest rate of digital currencies in a scenario in which the CBDC is universally accessible. As a consequence of this influence, it would be unusual for lending to occur at a rate lower than the CBDC interest rate (Echarte Fernández et al. 2021).
The framework is as follows:-
Figure 2: Framework
(Source: Echarte Fernández et al. 2021).
The above figure reflects that the absence of negative interest payments offered by the Central Bank Digital Currency would significantly limit the framework for monetary policy, hence preventing the central bank from effectively surpassing the zero lower bounds. This observation implies that the expenses linked to monetary policy would continue to be substantial. The implementation of a capped quantity of central bank digital currency to households, accompanied by a minimum interest rate, can potentially yield several advantages in relation to monetary policy.(Ozili 2023).
The idea of Central Bank Digital Currencies generates a lot of questions at the national level; however, when viewed from the perspective of international trade, it generates an even greater number of questions. The research that is being conducted in this area is still in the preliminary stages of advancement at the moment. This section provides an overview of current research topics, particularly focusing on the potential advantages of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) in enhancing cross-border payments within an economy that is becoming increasingly globalized. The subsequent conversation offers a concise summary of the issues, followed by recommendations for upcoming investigations that can potentially contribute to the development of Central Bank Digital Currency design strategies.
The research that was carried out by Keister and Monnet (2019) reveals that the use of a CBDC, in addition to boosting the efficiency with which payments are processed, also has the advantage of enhancing the efficiency with which information is processed. As the example of DD demonstrates, the gathering of pertinent information is an extremely important component of the efforts made by the banking regulator to prevent a situation that is initially controllable from developing into one that is unmanageable. However, it is regularly noted that banks have the desire to delay the transmission of critical information regarding their status, in the anticipation that they may obtain financial support in times of crisis. This expectation is based on the fact that it is more likely that they will receive financial assistance in times of crisis.
There is a lag in the communication between the central bank and the households when it comes to the withdrawal of funds from the banking system. The issue is different when looking at it from the perspective of a Central Bank Digital Currency , as transactions take place in a digital format and are meant to be carried out as quickly as possible.
The subsequent result is that the central bank is in a position to determine the origin of the money that are undergoing the transfer process. Due to the fact that up-to-date data is readily available, the central bank is in a position to rapidly react and put necessary actions into place in order to reduce the amount of cash that is flowing out of the economy. Among these actions may be the proclamation of a bank holiday or the provision of financial support to financial institutions that are undergoing a run. When studied within the framework of a full general equilibrium model that takes into account all characteristics of central bank digital currencies the idea that a central bank digital currency contributes to financial fragility may seem logical. However, its explanation becomes difficult to defend when this framework is used. Therefore, it is wise to consider design advice that is anchored in concerns about financial stability with scepticism.
For example, Kumhof and Noone (2018) argue that there shouldn't be no limits placed on how easily bank deposits can be converted into a digital currency issued by the central bank. In a comparable manner, Bindseil (2020) proposes that a CBDC should restrict the number of positions that can be held within the organisation. Even if these designs have the potential to improve the financial security of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), they may accidentally disrupt payment efficiency in conditions when there is no cause for concern over the state of the financial system, which is the case in the vast majority of situations around the world.
The instalment frameworks and foundation for computerised money significantly affect the financial strategy of national banks. With the ascent of advanced monetary forms, national banks are confronted with new difficulties in dealing with their financial arrangements successfully. Advanced economic forms, like Bitcoin and Ethereum, work on decentralised networks that sidestep conventional financial mediators. This has raised worries for national banks as they let entirely go over the creation and conveyance of cash (Karjaluoto et al., 2020). Moreover, the namelessness related to advanced monetary forms creates issues in observing exchanges and identifying criminal operations, further convoluting financial approach execution. In light of these difficulties, national banks have been investigating different ways to integrate advanced monetary standards into their current instalment frameworks and foundations. A few national banks have considered making their own computerised economic forms, while others are zeroing in on directing existing digital currencies to keep up with command over monetary solidness and financial development.
Figure 3: From November 2009 to November 2020, the value of the Bank of England's quantitative easing measures
(Source:Statista. 2022)
The mix of computerised cash into the instalment frameworks and foundation presents two unique open doors and dangers for national banks, expecting them to adjust their strategies to guarantee compelling guidelines, oversight, risk the board, and shopper assurance in this advancing scene. As of 2021, approximately 86% of central banks are researching or piloting digital currencies. By 2030, it is projected that 20% of all payment transactions globally will be conducted using digital currencies (Alzoubi et al., 2022). Traditional payment systems can process around 2,000 transactions per second. Digital currency payment systems have the potential to process up to 100,000 transactions per second, significantly improving transaction speed and efficiency. Globally, around 1.7 billion adults still do not have access to a bank account.
The ability to facilitate the Federal Reserve's modification of nominal interest rates to the extent necessary for stimulating the economy to any required degree is the primary benefit that a CBDC that bears interest and features a negative interest rate could offer monetary policy. This advantage could be provided by a CBDC that features a negative interest rate.. This would be the mechanism behind the process. Eliminating paper money would have to be done if the strategy outlined above is to have any chance of being successful (Lee, Yan and Wang 2021).
A few central banks are mulling over releasing their digital currencies at some point in the not-too-distant future (Echarte Fernández et al. 2021).
The majority of people consider CBDC to be an innovative form of a central bank's currency. It also refers to a central bank's liability that is expressed in a pre-existing unit of measurement and serves as both a means of transaction and a means of preserving worth. This liability is referred to as "money supply." This new development would be appropriate for use by individual customers, but it might not apply to commercial businesses. Central banks are already providing a form of digital currency in the form of reserves or settlement account balances kept by particular financial institutions, such as commercial banks, at the central bank. A Central Bank Digital Currency has the potential to function as a payment mechanism and a repository of worth if it possesses additional design characteristics in addition to the foundational attributes that have already been discussed. These characteristics are listed below. The choices made in this area will have significant repercussions for compensation, the introduction of monetary policies, and the general stability of the financial system as a whole (Ozili 2023; Andolfatto, 2021).
It is possible to reimburse interest, whether positive or negative, on CBDCs based on tokens or accounts, just like it is technically possible to reimburse interest on other digital central bank liabilities. The interest rate for CBDC may be established to either match with a current policy rate or diverge from it to encourage or discourage the use of CBDC. This can be done to achieve the respective goals of encouraging or discouraging the use of CBDC. When performing retail or wholesale payment transactions, interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing accounts can be helpful financial tools for one's disposal. The payment of interest on a financial instrument can potentially increase its desirability, mainly if the instrument also serves as a method of maintaining one's purchasing power over time. It is possible that the need to provide a safe and centralized monetary instrument in a given jurisdiction may be sufficient justification for the introduction of CBDC (Lee, Yan, and Wang 2021).
This is especially true if there is a significant reduction in the use of tangible currency in that jurisdiction. Compared to the physical currency that central banks release, the ease of use and efficiency of digital payment methods provided by the private sector has significantly improved over the last few decades thanks to technological advancements. As a direct consequence of the developments above in Sweden, the quantity of actual currency in circulation has been reduced to a significantly smaller amount. Different central banks of different countries are investigating to establish the potential benefits of introducing an electronic version of the Swedish krona, which will be referred to as the e-krona. The primary purpose of this investigation is to determine whether or not the introduction of an electronic krona would make it possible for the general public to continue to have access to money issued by the central bank. It would strengthen the reliability of the payment system. Within this particular framework, it is also plausible to consider the repercussions of refraining from Central Bank Digital Currency issuance. This could have several effects, including but not limited to digital currencies (Echarte Fernández et al. 2021; Lee, Yan, and Wang 2021).
Private digital tokens may gradually replace money issued by central banks in how interactions are conducted. Compared to the liabilities of the central bank, the possibility for credit and liquidity risks may be greater for retail customers due to their exposure to private issuers of digital tokens or the absence of an issuer altogether. This is because retail customers may have more exposure to private issuers of digital tokens (Ozili 2023; Andolfatto, 2021). Due to the volatile valuations and the need for adequate protection for investors and customers, private digital tokens are currently an unreliable choice for serving as a widely accepted payment method or a reliable measure of value or currency. In general, central banks are expected to prioritize enhancing the efficacy and practicality of private systems while also carefully monitoring the advancement of emerging technologies and the prospective applications of those technologies.
At the current time, the problem of cyber-security is considered to be a significant operational obstacle for both the systems used by central banks and the financial sector as a whole. Cyber threats pose a significant threat to practically all payment, clearing, and settlement systems, such as malicious software and fraudulent activities. Nevertheless, one of the challenges that must be overcome is the creation of a ubiquitous CBDC that is open to a large number of participants and is susceptible to a variety of attacks. In addition, because it is so easy to send large amounts of money via electronic means, fraudulent activities can potentially have an even greater impact than they already do. The distribution of CBDCs would make it necessary to put robust precautions in place to reduce the possibility of cyber attacks. Concerns have been raised regarding the unpredictability surrounding prospective new technologies' capacity to uphold a dependable risk management framework. Because central bank services play a pivotal role in the smooth functioning of an economy, stringent requirements for dependability, capacity, efficiency, and durability are necessary. Central banks are generally known to implement stringent operational standards for their various services and processes (Ozili 2023).
If they are created properly, digital currencies could make payment systems better by using digital versions of money issued by central banks that are better at using technology. This is given as long as digital currencies are built correctly. This would make sure that the central bank stays dedicated to supporting the core qualities that make it unique, such as decisiveness, liquidity, and stability. In the future, these groups might be an important part of a digital payment system that works well. It would be easy for people to get to, and strong rules for data governance and privacy would be in place. Still, to get the possible benefits for the public's well-being as a whole, as well as to protect financial stability and encourage cooperation between the public and private sectors, it is important to learn more about the design options for Central Bank Digital Currencies and how they might affect the economy as a whole. These possible benefits for the health and happiness of everyone can only happen when this condition is met. There are three main purposes that money serves in society. As both a unit of account and a measure of its size, the dollar is used to count and describe world economic activity. The second thing it does is act as a means of exchange, making transactions and exchanges easier. Additionally, it stores value and allows the transfer of purchasing power over a certain period of time (Ozili 2023; Andolfatto 2021).
Transactions across international borders are subject to various challenges, the most significant of which is that they are notoriously pricey, frequently slow, lack sufficient levels of accountability and transparency, and are only sometimes available to certain individuals. The G20 has established the enhancement of cross-border payments as a priority, and they have approved a multi-year, multi-faceted initiative to accomplish this goal by the year 2025 (Echarte Fernández et al. 2021).
It would be to the benefit of individuals as well as economies on a worldwide scale to have access to international payment services that are quicker, more convenient, less expensive, and more open to everyone. These sorts of enhancements would benefit the expansion of the economy, as well as global commerce, worldwide development, and financial inclusion (Lee, Yan and Wang 2021).
The existing body of academic research has a significant flaw in that the majority of it is founded on secondary data sources and speculative assumptions. This is a significant constraint. Previous authors have only exploited a small number of original sources when doing their research. Obtaining primary information from a variety of central bank officials and customers of digital currencies is therefore of major relevance. This will make it much easier for the researcher to carry out the technique for the study in an effective manner. There are considerable voids in the body of literature that is currently available.
One of the most significant issues that digital money presents is the possibility that it may disrupt established methods that are now used for the transmission of financial policy. Due to the fact that they operate outside of the traditional financial system, digital currencies have the ability to steer clear of the sway that conventional central banks have over the amount of money in circulation and interest rates. In an economy driven mostly by digital currency, this raises questions about the usefulness of traditional financial instruments. Concerns about the viability of the financial system have been raised in response to the rise in the use of complex currencies. Due to the significant volatility that they are known for, computerised monetary forms have the potential to be a source of risk for both the financial markets and businesses. The Central Bank ought to perform a complete evaluation of these risks and put necessary safeguards into place in order to limit potential disruptions to the financial stability.
A calculated system for grasping the effect of computerised cash on the financial strategy of the National Bank of the UK can give an organised point of view on this perplexing issue. Such a system can help policymakers, specialists, and examiners assess and explore the developing scene of computerised monetary standards. Here is a reasonable structure illustrating the key aspects:
The growing importance of virtual currencies has inspired a number of national central banks around the world, including the Bank of England, to investigate the prospect of issuing their very own digital monetary instruments. The introduction of a Central Bank Digital Currency might have substantial repercussions for the framework of financial policy, providing the central bank with increased control over payment systems and affecting the dynamics of money supply. These changes would be brought about by the adoption of a Central Bank Digital Currency. It is vital that a vacuum in the literature detailing the influence that computerised monetary forms have had on the financial system of the Bank of England be bridged as the prevalence of computerised monetary forms continues to grow. Additional research in this area will give policymakers vital information that will allow them to modify and create financial regulatory frameworks that are robust and appropriate for the era of digital currency.
The framework is as follows:-
Figure 4: Conceptual Framework
Positivism research philosophy will be used by the researcher. In the course of this inquiry, the method of selection that will be utilized is called sampling at convenient points. The method of sampling known as convenience sampling is a non-probabilistic approach in which participants are chosen based on their accessibility and their motivation to take part in the study. As it draws on data gleaned from secondary sources, the analysis contained within this study will be one that is both comprehensive and fruitful (Greener 2018). In this study, there will be a lot of thought given to ethical issues. After being told about the goals of the study and their rights as subjects, the participants will give their informed consent
The introduction of digital currencies and other changes to payment systems will speed up both domestic and international transactions, lower the costs of these transactions, and increase the number of households in underdeveloped and rural areas that have access to financial services. Using digital currencies and the technologies that go with them is expected to lower the costs of making deals and getting and sharing information. Even though this seems reasonable, it may upset financial markets and make it harder for financial trouble to spread from one market to another (Ozili 2023).
Researchers will select journals and books for secondary research. Inclusive and exclusive strategy will be used.
The secondary data will be chosen for the given research process. For the purposes of this investigation, a sample strategy that is appropriate includes those qualities of being cost-effective, fruitful, and rapid in data collection. However, it's possible that the researchers were biased in their selection of participants, so the findings might not be representative of the population as a whole.
An inductive research approach will be used for the study. This approach begins with the collection of a small amount of data and evidence before proceeding to more expansive generalizations. This technique of research is suitable for studies that aim to deepen our understanding of how organizational culture and dynamics can change over time. In order to collect the data, we are going to make use of both observational and quantitative methods (Greener 2018).
The methodology chosen for this study is descriptive research design. The purpose of descriptive design is to analyse and depict a phenomenon or event in order to provide an accurate and thorough representation of the subject under investigation. This design involves the collection of data through interviews, surveys, and observation, which is then summarised and interpreted using statistical analysis. Descriptive design is used to identify patterns and trends, explore the connections between variables, and create a detailed representation of the characteristics of a specific sample.
Quantitative and qualitative approaches to research will both be utilized in the course of this investigation as part of a strategy known as secondary methodologies as it enables the researchers to obtain data from such a wide variety of sources, this strategy ultimately results in a more in-depth understanding of the research problem. For the purpose of better understanding the participants' perspectives and experiences, qualitative data will be collected through the use of in-depth conversations with the participants. In order to arrive at precise numbers, quantitative information will be gathered in the shape of a questionnaire (Manti and Licari 2018).
The investigation will also make use of secondary data from relevant sources, such as review articles, publications that have undergone peer review, and other resources. These secondary sources, which will be used to support the conclusions drawn from the data, will extend the scope of the study's overall understanding of the topic while also providing it with greater depth and breadth of coverage. The study will be able to deliver a comprehensive and well-rounded analysis of the research problem if it makes use of both primary and secondary data sources.
The data that was collected will be investigated using qualitative approaches, as a comprehensive analysis will be performed on the data that was collected. These methods will be applied to the data that was collected. Secondary data has been collected for the research,
It will be possible to derive insightful conclusions from the data by utilizing this method, which will offer information that can be used to direct decision-making. In order to conduct an analysis that is founded on the qualitative information that was gleaned from the conversations, the data will first be transcribed and then coded. The material will be analyzedusing content analysis in order to discover themes and patterns that repeatedly appear throughout it. Central banks depend heavily on the banking system to keep the economy stable. If traditional banking business models and their established place in the financial system were to change, it could be challenging for central banks to keep the economy stable. Central banks have to deal with these problems because they rely so much on the banking system to stabilize the economy. Countries more likely to be affected are those whose banking systems rely primarily on small retail and demand deposits, use digital payment methods sparingly, and have weak macroeconomic factors. Some of the suggested design features of Central Bank Digital Currency, such as putting boundaries on how much CBDC a person can hold and not paying for CBDC, may help to reduce the risks of disintermediation. But more than these steps might be needed on their own. Central banks need to make sure they find and deal with all financial risks that were not planned
The data will be kept secret and only the study team will be able to access it. The study won't touch on anything controversial, and people who take part will be able to skip any questions that make them feel uncomfortable. The study will also follow the rules set by the proper Institutional Review Board and regulatory organizations. This is to make sure that any ethical concerns are taken care of. The goal of these rules is to make sure that researchers act in a way that is ethical and puts the safety and freedom of subjects first (Manti and Licari 2018). The reliability and validity of a study's findings can be improved through the utilization of a wider variety of research methods, which can be accomplished through the combination of numerous research approaches. The integration process, which includes comparing and validating the findings from a variety of sources, is made possible by the utilization of both quantitative and qualitative methods of investigation.
Validity and trustworthiness make sure that the results of a study are correct. Stability and regularity are what make data reliable. Pilot research and a standard survey form made this study reliable. The pilot study found problems with the form and made it possible to make changes.Validity is based on how accurate and precise the data are. Professionals checked that the secondary data was relevant and useful for the study, which is how face validity was made sure. A thorough study of the literature made sure that the content was valid. Using the collected data to do a factor analysis proved construct validity
The parts that came before this one explained the methods, approaches, strategies, and protocols that were used to carry out this research investigation. These terms cover all of the different methods that were used to do the study. When doing schoolwork, it's important to keep other things that need the attention in mind. The condition stated above will be talked about in the next part of this research. Recognizing and thinking about social problems are important parts that shouldn't be ignored. The study followed all of the University's ethical rules, including those about getting permission for the project.
For the purpose of the study, secondary sources will be utilised.. Nevertheless, the use of secondary data sources such industry papers, journals, and articles provided to function as an effective means of enhancing the study's overall robustness. This study investigated the dependability and validity of the data to guarantee that the findings are accurate and proper. When it comes to the use of digital currencies, the primary goal of the central banks is to provide a standardised method of transaction that can be used throughout the entirety of the digital economy. Their goal does not include bringing about the collapse of the existing monetary order by means of the circulation of a medium of exchange that is widely recognised.
The purpose of this study is to improve our understanding of how Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) can be optimised as a payment method while simultaneously reducing the total outflows from central bank balance sheets. The administration and availability of central bank reserves, the distinction between wholesale and retail central bank digital currencies, and most importantly, the ramifications of these currencies on the global stage are all questions that have yet to be satisfactorily answered. These questions include the harmonisation of existing and innovative infrastructures; the administration and accessibility of central bank reserves; and the distinction between wholesale and retail central bank digital currencies.
The findings reflect that the increasing popularity and usage of digital currency have posed new challenges to central banks in managing monetary policy effectively, raising concerns about the financial stability of these institutions. The decentralised nature of digital currencies, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, not only undermines the control that central banks traditionally have over the money supply but also challenges their ability to influence interest rates and stabilise the economy through their monetary policy tools (D’Orazio and Popoyan, 2022). Furthermore, the anonymity associated with digital currency transactions poses risks regarding illicit activities such as money laundering and terrorist financing. Central banks are now compelled to closely monitor and understand the intricate workings of these emerging technologies in order to adapt their policies accordingly. In doing so, they must strike a delicate balance between embracing innovation and ensuring robust financial stability by crafting regulatory frameworks that address potential risks associated with digital currencies while facilitating their widespread adoption.
The market capitalisation of Bitcoin, the most notable computerised money, represented more than 40% of the complete market capitalisation in 2021. The market capitalisation of Ethereum, the second-biggest advanced cash, represented around 20% of the absolute market capitalisation in 2021 (Fouejieuet al., 2019). The digital currency market is expected to witness significant growth in the coming years, with a projected market capitalisation of over $5 trillion by 2025. As of 2021, around 86% of central banks worldwide are actively researching or experimenting with CBDCs.
Figure 5: Overall Impact
(Source: Bindseil 2019).
The introduction and widespread adoption of digital currency has led to significant implications for the monetary policy of central banks worldwide. As digital currencies operate independently from traditional financial intermediaries, their decentralised nature challenges the existing framework of monetary policy. Central banks traditionally implement monetary policy through interest rate adjustments and open market operations, but these tools may become less effective with the proliferation of digital currencies. The ability to transact directly with peer-to-peer networks reduces the reliance on central bank-controlled money supply, potentially diminishing their ability to influence inflation or economic growth effectively. Moreover, the lack of a centralised authority governing digital currencies makes it challenging for central banks to monitor and regulate them adequately. Consequently, central banks are forced to rethink their strategies and potentially develop new regulatory frameworks explicitly tailored to the digital currency ecosystem in order to maintain efficacy in their monetary policies and safeguard financial stability. Digital currencies like Bitcoin have exhibited high price volatility. For instance, in 2021, Bitcoin's cost went from around $29,000 to more than $60,000, influencing its actual capacity as a store of significant worth and trade medium (Ha et al., 2020). Information on consistency with global principles, including against illegal tax avoidance (AML) and know-your-client (KYC) prerequisites, can show the adequacy of worldwide endeavours to moderate dangers related to computerised monetary forms.
Figure 6: Prices of Digital Currencies
(Source: Chatziantoniou et al., 2021)
The effect of computerised money on the financial strategy of national banks has been a subject of enormous premium and discussion lately. The transmission component through which financial strategy influences the genuine economy assumes an essential part in keeping up with cost security and advancing monetary development. With the development of computerised economic forms, for example, Bitcoin and Ethereum, national banks are confronted with new difficulties and contemplations in executing powerful financial strategies (Chatziantoniou et al., 2021). Customary devices like financing cost changes may not be as powerful while managing advanced monetary standards as they work outside the traditional financial framework. Furthermore, the decentralised idea of these economic forms presents possible dangers to monetary dependability and expands the trouble of managing their utilisation. National banks need to investigate creative ways to deal with screen, control, and integrate computerised monetary forms into their money-related approach structures to address these arising difficulties while outfitting the advantages that they might accommodate by upgrading monetary incorporation and proficiency.
Figure 7: Currency Awareness
(Source: Chatziantoniou et al., 2021)
The rapid development of decentralized digital currencies, such as bitcoin, has had a significant impact on the monetary policies of various countries. Central banks in major nations acknowledge that while they can enhance oversight of private digital currencies through legislative measures, their ability to safeguard user rights and prevent illicit activities is limited. However, they are unable to prevent the adverse effects on the central bank's monetary policy resulting from these currencies. Hence, while the market has assessed the necessity, feasibility, and security of certain encrypted digital currencies such as bitcoin, certain central banks are actively investigating the potential issuance of their own Central Bank Digital Currencies. The majority of current digital currencies are not issued by central banks or governmental authorities, and their circulation does not follow the conventional commercial banking system. The unfavorable influence on the regulation and control of the central bank will be evident once it attains a specific magnitude. One approach involves diminishing the efficacy of the monetary policy. The central bank's regulatory authority is contingent upon its exclusive right to issue currency and its role as the lender of last resort. The inclusion or retrieval of the base currency serves as a mechanism for managing the liquidity of the financial system, exerting an influence on short-term interest rates, and consequently impacting economic activities such as savings and investment. Once the digital currency attains a particular magnitude and assumes the role of a currency within the economy, its amount and price will exert a substantial influence on the tangible economy. However, the central bank is devoid of the capacity to effectively regulate the quantity and price of these currencies. The second objective is to impact the seigniorage revenue. The introduction and widespread use of digital money may potentially undermine the exclusive authority of central banks in issuing currency, hence leading to a reduction in seigniorage revenue for these central banks. The third objective is to diminish the precision of monetary indicators. Certain digital currency payment networks have the potential to serve as an alternative to the prevailing payment system, which is primarily governed by central banks and commercial banks. These networks operate independently of central banks, thereby posing a challenge to the central bank's capacity to oversee fund transfers and gather data via the current payment system. A reduced level of sensitivity towards market information will thus undermine the efficacy of central banks in implementing monetary policy (Bindseil 2019).
Figure 8: Existence Growth
(Source: Chatziantoniou et al., 2021)
Emerging as a topic that is currently gaining substantial traction and importance in the academic and policy discourse is the idea of central banks creating their own digital currencies to use as money. If they are developed properly, digital currencies could provide a means through which existing payment systems can be made more efficient through the utilisation of technologically advanced representations of money that is issued by central banks. This strategy enables the preservation of basic qualities that are unique to the activities of central banks, such as the immutability of transactions, the simplicity with which they can be converted into currency, and their dependability. The combination of these technologies has the potential to serve as the core foundation for a digital payment system that is highly efficient, hence making it easier for it to be used by a wider population. In addition, the implementation of these standards may contribute to the development of rigorous rules for the governance of data and the protection of individual privacy. However, it is crucial to conduct additional research on the design options of Central Bank Digital Currencies and their potential macrofinancial consequences in order to achieve the possible advantages for the general well-being of the general population, while also maintaining financial stability and fostering collaboration between the public and private sectors. Adam Smith presented a comprehensive description of money, focusing on its three fundamental purposes within society, and he did so by using examples. To begin, money is a unit of account, meaning that it acts as a standard measure for the many financial transactions that take place. Second, it serves as a medium of exchange, which makes it easier for people to buy and sell products and services by means of monetary transactions. Last but not least, money serves as a store of value, making it possible to shift one's purchasing power from one point in time to another. When it comes to the implementation of Central Bank Digital Currencies the major purpose of central banks is to develop a medium of exchange that is widely recognised within the digital economy. However, their goal does not include destabilising the existing financial system by creating a store of value that is widely recognised by everyone. Within this particular context, academic research is contributing to a better understanding of how the effectiveness of Central Bank Digital Currencies as a payment method can be enhanced, while simultaneously minimising the overall impact on the balance sheets of central banks. In addition, there are several big and complicated questions that haven't been answered yet, and this calls for additional research. One such example concerns the interoperability between preexisting and emerging infrastructures, as well as the challenges surrounding the accessibility and regulation of central bank funds. Another example relates to the accessibility of central bank money. In addition, the question of the division and assignment of resources is another important one that should be thoroughly investigated (Bindseil 2019).
Even though rapidly digitising payments can save time and money, it also has the potential to create legal and security issues, undermine financial stability, and make it more difficult for monetary policy to reach the people who require it. People will be able to utilise new payment technologies to send and receive money that is backed by the central bank, and central banks are now considering and experimenting with ways to make this possible so as to make things safer. One of these is digital currency issued by central banks, which functions similarly to cash but is stored digitally. There are a great number of potential applications for digital currency that might be utilised by central banks. The sort of digital currency that a central bank chooses to use may have an impact on the manner in which it conducts monetary policy, determines interest rates, and transfers funds to other nations. This has a significant bearing on the effective lower bound, the value of which is susceptible to fluctuations in either direction depending on the current configuration of the digital system utilised by the central bank. Because the CBDC rate would have a greater influence on deposit rates in business banks than it does at the present time, the interest rate would be the variable that would be most significantly impacted. It is not entirely apparent what impact this will have on bank lending rates or the loan channel in general. It would depend on the sources from which the banks obtained their funds while deposits were decreasing as a result of money being transferred to the central bank. If commercial banks use central bank funds, it's conceivable for the interest rates set by the central bank to have a greater influence on the rates at which they lend money. If financial institutions prefer to borrow money from other financial institutions, their ability to significantly alter interest rates on loans may be limited. However, the central bank may still be able to do so. The effective lower bound could remain the same or even fall if CBDC bears interest, which is dependent on how popular this digital currency is. If CBDC bears interest, the effective lower bound could be below zero. There is a lack of clarity regarding the impact that CBDC would have on the industry as a whole. Because of this, transaction costs might be reduced, which is beneficial for increased output and welfare. If, on the other hand, non-residents were permitted to use CBDC for speculative purposes, the only component of the mechanism that controls the transmission of monetary policy that would be affected would be the exchange rate channel. On the other hand, it could be a problem for central banks of emerging markets most of the time because of the big changes in the amount of money coming into and going out of CBDC based on how willing people are to take risks, just like it is now with other assets in emerging markets (Chatziantoniou et al., 2021)
The emergence of digital currency can be regarded as an unavoidable consequence of the 2008 financial crisis. There are both pros and downsides associated with it. Nevertheless, the current digital currency systems are unable to generate significant impact in the global economy due to their constrained scale. They exclusively serve as a medium of exchange, unit of account, and store of value for a minuscule fraction of the population. One notable illustration involves the utilization of Bitcoin by Venezuelans as a means to safeguard their personal financial stability amongst the occurrence of hyperinflation within their nation. Digital Currency is anticipated to yield favorable outcomes for monetary policy in the forthcoming period, as it is considered an alternative type of digital currency issued by central banks. Digital currency is issued by central banks, which strategically plan and regulate its usage to maintain authority over the monetary system and safeguard the interests of interested parties. The majority of governments are unlikely to permit the substitution of the existing fiscal money system with any digital currency system, including Central Bank Digital Currency within a limited timeframe. The establishment of a decentralized currency system remains a significant undertaking that requires substantial progress.When opposed to traditional bank deposits as a method of payment, the implementation of a universally applicable Central Bank Digital Currency that places an emphasis on payment efficiency has the potential to result in significant technological breakthroughs. When opposed to bank deposits, a Central Bank Digital Currency would have various advantages, the most notable of which are improved transferability, increased creditworthiness, and a market value that remains relatively stable due to the underlying architecture of the currency. The utilisation of standardised application programming interfaces for the transfer of funds between banks is likely to enhance the competitive landscape among banks in terms of attracting deposits in the event that all banks universally accept and efficiently process payments made in Central Bank Digital Currency upon request, with little cost and rapidity on an intra-day basis. This scenario is based on the assumption that all banks will universally accept and process CBDC payments efficiently. Because banks are no longer guaranteed to be the only ones who can have access to money through central banks, there is a possibility that the segmentation of money markets will become less pronounced. It is highly likely that the speed at which monetary policy is communicated to market interest rates will pick up some slack and experience an increase in the next years. As an illustration, it can be noticed that a central bank would be necessary to adopt a somewhat lesser adjustment to its policy rate in order to attain a specified elevation in the average market interest rate. This is something that can be observed because of the relationship between the two. In addition to that, the previously mentioned increase in interest rates would be implemented at a speed that was somewhere between normal and accelerated. The level of cross-sectional dispersion in rates among comparable instruments would decrease. This would be a good thing. When it comes to the process of withdrawing monies, there is a disparity in the time of the correspondence that takes place between the central bank and people. When viewed from the point of view of a Central Bank Digital Currency, the conditions undergo a substantial transformation. This is due to the fact that transactions are carried out electronically and are optimised for efficiency.
As an immediate consequence of this, the central bank is able to obtain the competence of determining the origin of the monies that have been delivered. Because it is so easy to obtain information that is up to current, the central bank is in a position to rapidly react and take the required procedures to limit the amount of currency that is released into the economy. The provision of financial assistance to financial institutions that are experiencing a run or the implementation of a bank holiday are both potential corrective actions that could be taken. The idea that a central bank digital currency adds to financial fragility becomes more reasonable when it is considered within the context of a full general equilibrium model that encompasses all of the characteristics of the currencies in question. The defence of its explanation, on the other hand, becomes more difficult when this framework is put into action. As a consequence of this, design proposals that are based on concerns regarding the stability of the financial system have to be considered with a substantial amount of scepticism.
Moreover, the identification of unlawful activities and the monitoring of transactions are further hampered by the anonymity connected with advanced monetary forms, therefore further augmenting the intricacy of financial approach implementation. In light of the challenges that have been discussed, national central banks have been doing research into a variety of approaches to incorporate modern monetary standards into their existing foundations and payment arrangements. While some central banks have contemplated the deployment of their very own computerised economic systems, others are concentrating their efforts on monitoring digital currencies that have already been formed in order to maintain their authority over monetary stability and the development of the financial sector.
The usage or removal of the base currency has the effect of influencing short-term interest rates, which in turn has an effect on deposits and investment activities. This has the effect of improving the management of liquidity within the financial system. When the digital currency reaches a certain level of importance and starts to serve as a medium of exchange in the economy, the value and quantity of the digital currency will have a significant impact on the economy that is based on physical assets. On the other hand, the central bank does not possess the capability to properly regulate the number and price of these currencies through its regulatory mechanisms.
The effect of computerised money on the financial strategy of the National Bank in the UK is a perplexing matter that requires cautious thought. While computerised monetary forms, for example, Bitcoin, have built up some decent momentum and fame among a speciality gathering of clients, their general impact on financial strategy is still moderately restricted. The decentralised idea of computerised monetary standards presents difficulties for national banks in observing and controlling them. Notwithstanding, there is potential for national banks to use blockchain innovation to upgrade existing arrangements and frameworks. By embracing development and effectively investigating organisations with fintech organisations, national banks can remain in front of mechanical progressions while keeping up with command over money-related approaches. It is essential for policymakers to work out some harmony between addressing concerns connected with monetary steadiness, tax evasion, and illegal exercises related to computerised monetary standards while additionally cultivating a climate that energises development here.
The utilization of a Central Bank Digital Currency by individuals would enable them to conduct transactions and make payments, with the assurance that it is supported by the central bank and functions akin to physical currency. The concept can be described as a form of electronic currency, akin to a digital representation of a traditional banknote. The decision on the establishment of a Central Bank Digital Currency has not yet been made by the government.
If a Central Bank Digital Currency becomes accessible, individuals may opt to transfer funds from their bank accounts to CBDC wallets. Individuals may seek to substitute bank savings with Central Bank Digital Currency in periods of economic turmoil due to their perception of enhanced safety and security. In the absence of regulatory measures such as limitations on individual holdings of Central Bank Digital Currency, the potential exacerbation of the issue is a plausible outcome (Echarte Fernández et al. 2021).
The implementation of a Central Bank Digital Currency system inherently precludes the facilitation of private transactions, as is the case with physical currency. This measure is implemented to prevent the utilization of these devices for criminal activities on a significant scale. Certain design decisions can provide a degree of privacy protection; nonetheless, it is important to note that solely relying on technological specifications may not sufficiently alleviate individuals' concerns regarding potential government surveillance. The potential involvement of the Bank of England in contentious debates pertaining to privacy could have adverse implications for corporate operations (Claeys and Demertzis 2019).
The implementation of a Central Bank Digital Currency has the potential to enhance the efficacy of unconventional monetary policy measures for central banks. During the committee session, the Governor of the Bank of England expressed his perspective that a Central Bank Digital Currency does not appear to be a suitable instrument for conducting monetary policy. Nevertheless, the committee was also apprised of the possibility that his successors may hold divergent viewpoints. There is a potential for these measures to confer increased authority and accountability to the Bank of England with regards to the economy. Thorough examination should be conducted when considering any modifications to the monetary policy tools employed by the Bank (Andolfatto 2021).
The potential implementation of Central Bank Digital Currencies by major competitors of the United Kingdom has the potential to significantly impact the approach of Western nations towards foreign affairs. One illustrative instance pertains to the SWIFT message system, which facilitates the United States' ability to effectively implement sanctions. Nevertheless, certain nations, such as China, exhibit a strong determination to employ Central Bank Digital Currency technology as a means to establish novel alternatives to the existing mechanism of global money transfer.
Multiple banking institutions have the potential to employ a "wholesale" central bank digital currency hence offering some advantages. The overall functioning of the financial system is deemed to be satisfactory in its current state. Nevertheless, the implementation of a Central Bank Digital Currency has the potential to enhance the efficiency of trading and settlement processes for securities. However, it is important to do further study and testing in order to ascertain its viability and effectiveness. The committee proposes that the Joint Taskforce convene a consultation regarding the utilization of a bulk Central Bank Digital Currency concurrently with its consultation on the retail CBDC in the year 2022.
To optimize the utilization of this period, it is imperative for the Government and the Bank of England to collaborate in establishing international standards that align with the values and objectives of the United Kingdom. For instance, it is imperative to prioritize the fulfillment of privacy, security, and operational standards.
In the event that non-banking entities seek to alter the composition of their portfolios, they may opt to provide loans directly as a means to substitute certain bank loans. Nevertheless, this has the potential to impact the disbursement of other loans, particularly those extended to financial institutions. In numerous developed nations, a substantial portion of funds originates from non-bank sources, whilst a lower proportion of individuals' assets are held in bank deposits. Alternative sources of funding exist outside of traditional banking institutions, however, they are unlikely to serve as a comprehensive substitute for bank loans, particularly for smaller enterprises. This is due to the fact that the lender typically requires extensive knowledge regarding this specific type of loan. Currently, private banks possess a competitive advantage in this domain due to their possession of consumer deposit information. The potential adoption of CBDCas a substitute for physical currency has the potential to alter the balance sheet of the central bank through the exchange of liabilities. In a novel development, there is a possibility of exchanging central bank digital currency and reserves, which are recorded as liabilities on the central bank's balance sheet, for a portion of client deposits held at commercial banks. This scenario would occur in the event that banks possess an adequate amount of reserves from the central bank. The second scenario is likely to exert a more substantial impact on the aggregate balance sheets of various sectors within the economy, particularly the business banking industry. The implementation of CBDChas the potential to result in a significant decrease in savings held in commercial banks, as well as a reduction in the overall quantity of reserves within the financial system (Claeys and Demertzis 2019).
This phenomenon has the potential to exert pressure on critical short-term money market interest rates. In order to mitigate fluctuations in interest rates, the central bank has the ability to adjust the quantity of reserves that are accessible. There exist two primary methods through which the central bank can accomplish this objective: through the acquisition of assets or through the provision of monetary funds. Regardless of the scenario, the balance sheet would exhibit an increase in size subsequent to the implementation of the CBDC. Through the acquisition of additional assets, the central bank possesses the ability to exert influence not only on the markets pertaining to the assets it is procuring, such as government bonds, but also to amplify its impact within these markets. CBDChas the potential to exert an impact even in situations characterized by favorable conditions. The particular parameters of a given implementation would be contingent upon the legislative and operational framework governing the CBDC, as well as the manner in which banks and other financial service providers interact with it. An illustrative instance involves a CBDCthat is under the ownership or administration of financial institutions, catering specifically to their clientele. In this scenario, the CBDC would be subject to a distinct set of regulations and guidelines. In order to mitigate the potential hazards associated with abrupt withdrawal of deposits, regulatory bodies or intermediaries may consider implementing restrictions on individual holdings and withdrawals (Claeys and Demertzis 2019).
Additionally, it should be noted that the effectiveness of this weapon may be limited in jurisdictions where the central bank has not actively considered the implementation of negative interest rates. The presentation of CBDC with specific characteristics has the potential to induce substitution behavior and hence necessitate the implementation of higher negative interest rates. Users may experience a negative reaction to these alterations, despite prior awareness of the potential for such occurrences. If the utilization of CBDC were to evolve into a mechanism for actively managing interest rate risk, it has the potential to undermine the societal benefits derived from ensuring widespread accessibility and inclusion. The potential extension of negative interest rates on household wealth during periods of economic strain may have adverse effects on the economy and undermine public trust (Echarte Fernández et al. 2021).
There may be a growing trend among individuals to transfer their deposits from commercial banks to holdings in Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). If this trend continues, it will put pressure on banks and ultimately result in a loss of funding for these financial institutions. Individuals may transfer their deposits from commercial banks to holdings in CBDCs. Because of the potential ramifications of this circumstance, banks may have a reduced ability to lend money to businesses and individuals, which might have a domino effect on both groups. Individuals who are part of a community that uses a CBDC have raised concerns about the potential for their privacy to be compromised as a result of the existence of a digital trail that records every transaction and deposit made using the CBDC. It is of the utmost importance to accept that the Bank of England will be subject to the same requirements as any other business with regard to privacy and compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This is because these regulations will be binding on the Bank of England. The implementation of a CBDC has the potential to put a country in a position where it is more vulnerable to the hazards of online fraud, illegal activities, and financial crime. Even though the existing domestic payments system in the UK is considered safe and effective, the introduction of a CBDC system has the potential to drive innovation and competition within the payments sector. This is because the CBDC system will use digital currencies. It is essential to keep in mind that these prospective benefits would be a welcome addition to the continuous improvements and innovations that are now taking place in the sector. The introduction of technology known as CBDC has the potential to heighten the level of competition in the market, which may, in turn, lead to a reduction in the fees that merchants are required to pay for processing card transactions (Andolfatto 2021).
After that, the savings from these reduced fees could be passed on to the client. However, our witnesses did not make many predictions about any major prospective benefits for consumers in the UK. It is suggested that the Joint Taskforce look into the possibility of including other consumer groups into the interaction forum that it maintains. With this feature, it would be easier to determine the possible advantages, if any, that a CBDCcould provide. Transaction fees and processing times can be quite lengthy and expensive for cross-border payments. The introduction of CBDCsystems that are both interoperable and cross-border has the ability to alleviate some of the challenges that are now being faced by lowering associated expenses. However, the implementation of such a system would call for strict adherence to regulatory frameworks, domestic legislations, and universally accepted technical standards, all of which are now a long way from gaining consensus. The financial technology (fintech) business is currently undergoing rapid improvements, which has led to an increase in the level of competition within the sector. As a result, cross-border payment processing has become significantly easier. In addition, there is a substantial amount of international cooperation going place at the present time in both the business and the governmental sectors with the intention of improving the effectiveness of international financial transactions. Regardless of whether or not Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are ultimately implemented, it is anticipated that the desirable effects of this collaborative work would be realized (Beniak 2019).
Within the context of the existing commercial banking system, stablecoins, which are a specific kind of cryptographic token, offer an appealing option for the processing of payment transactions. Even if they have safe custody arrangements and can keep their market valuation stable, central banks are cautious about the widespread adoption of privately issued cryptocurrencies that are meant for general use. This is the case even if the cryptocurrencies have been released for general use. There is a possibility that those who regulate the central banking system also own two principal concerns. Depending on the particular architecture, cryptocurrencies that permit hidden ownership and transactions on digital ledgers have the potential to aid money laundering and other illegal activities. These kinds of operations include drug trafficking and prostitution. Additionally, the broad adoption of a private cryptocurrency may have implications for the transmission of central bank monetary policy within the economy; these implications have the potential to deliver both positive and negative results, depending on the precise architecture of the cryptocurrency.
Adalid, R., Álvarez-Blázquez, Á., Assenmacher, K., Burlon, L., Dimou, M., López-Quiles, C., Fuentes, N.M., Meller, B., Muñoz, M., Radulova, P. and d’Acri, C.R., 2022. Central bank digital currency and bank intermediation. ECB Occasional Paper, (2022/293).
Ahnert, T., Assenmacher, K., Hoffmann, P., Leonello, A., Monnet, C. and Porcellacchia, D., 2022. The economics of central bank digital currency.
Andolfatto, D., 2021. Assessing the impact of central bank digital currency on private banks. The Economic Journal, 131(634), pp.525-540.
Auer, R., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Monnet, C., Rice, T. and Shin, H.S., 2022. Central bank digital currencies: motives, economic implications, and the research frontier. Annual review of economics, 14, pp.697-721.
Auer, R., Cornelli, G. and Frost, J., 2020. Rise of the central bank digital currencies: drivers, approaches and technologies.
Barrdear, J. and Kumhof, M., 2022. The macroeconomics of central bank digital currencies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 142, p.104148.
Beniak, P., 2019. Central bank digital currency and monetary policy: a literature review.
Bindseil, U., 2019. Central bank digital currency: Financial system implications and control. International Journal of Political Economy, 48(4), pp.303-335.
Bindseil, U (2020): “Tiered CBDC and the financial system”, ECB Working Paper Series, no 2351, January.
Bindseil, U., Panetta, F. and Terol, I., 2021. Central Bank Digital Currency: functional scope, pricing and controls. ECB Occasional Paper, (2021/286).
Böser, F. and Gersbach, H., 2020. Monetary policy with a central bank digital currency: The short and the long term.
Carapella, F. and Flemming, J., 2020. Central bank digital currency: A literature review.
Chiu, J., Davoodalhosseini, S.M., Jiang, J. and Zhu, Y., 2019. Bank market power and central bank digital currency: Theory and quantitative assessment.
Claeys, G. and Demertzis, M., 2019. The next generation of digital currencies: in search of stability (No. 2019/15). Bruegel Policy Contribution.
Cunha, P.R., Melo, P. and Sebastião, H., 2021. From bitcoin to central bank digital currencies: Making sense of the digital money revolution. Future Internet, 13(7), p.165.
Dell'Erba, M., 2019. Stablecoins in cryptoeconomics from initial coin offerings to central bank digital currencies. NYUJ Legis. & Pub. Pol'y, 22, p.1.
Echarte Fernández, M.Á., Náñez Alonso, S.L., Jorge-Vázquez, J. and Reier Forradellas, R.F., 2021. Central banks’ monetary policy in the face of the COVID-19 economic crisis: Monetary stimulus and the emergence of CBDCs. Sustainability, 13(8), p.4242.
Echarte Fernández, M.Á., Náñez Alonso, S.L., Jorge-Vázquez, J. and Reier Forradellas, R.F., 2021. Central banks’ monetary policy in the face of the COVID-19 economic crisis: Monetary stimulus and the emergence of CBDCs. Sustainability, 13(8), p.4242.
Eichengreen, B., 2021. Will Central Bank Digital Currencies Doom Dollar Dominance?. Project Syndicate, 9.
Fantacci, L. and Gobbi, L., 2021. Stablecoins, central bank digital currencies and US dollar hegemony: The geopolitical stake of innovations in money and payments. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, (0), p.20200053.
Fegatelli, P., 2022. A central bank digital currency in a heterogeneous monetary union: Managing the effects on the bank lending channel. Journal of Macroeconomics, 71, p.103392.
Fernández-Villaverde, J., Sanches, D., Schilling, L. and Uhlig, H., 2021. Central bank digital currency: Central banking for all?. Review of Economic Dynamics, 41, pp.225-242.
Garratt, R. and Zhu, H., 2021. On interest-bearing central bank digital currency with heterogeneous banks. Available at SSRN 3802977.
Greener, S. 2018. Research limitations: the need for honesty and common sense. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 567-568, DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1486785
Gross, M.M. and Siebenbrunner, C., 2019. Money creation in fiat and digital currency systems. International Monetary Fund.
Jia, P., 2020. Negative interest rates on central bank digital currency.
Keister, T and C Monnet (2019): “Central bank digital currency: stability and information”, mimeo.
Kim, Y.S. and Kwon, O., 2019. Central bank digital currency and financial stability. Bank of Korea WP, 6.
Lee, D.K.C., Yan, L. and Wang, Y., 2021. A global perspective on central bank digital currency. China Economic Journal, 14(1), pp.52-66.
Manti, S., and Licari, A. 2018. How to obtain informed consent for research. Breathe, 14(2), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.001918
Minesso, M.F., Mehl, A. and Stracca, L., 2022. Central bank digital currency in an open economy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 127, pp.54-68.
Nabilou, H., 2019. Central bank digital currencies: Preliminary legal observations. Journal of Banking Regulation.
Nabilou, H., 2019. Central bank digital currencies: Preliminary legal observations. Journal of Banking Regulation.
Náñez Alonso, S.L., Jorge-Vazquez, J. and Reier Forradellas, R.F., 2021. Central banks digital currency: Detection of optimal countries for the implementation of a CBDC and the implication for payment industry open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), p.72.
Opare, E.A. and Kim, K., 2020. A compendium of practices for central bank digital currencies for multinational financial infrastructures. IEEE Access, 8, pp.110810-110847.
Ozili, P.K., 2023. Central bank digital currency research around the World: a review of literature. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(2), pp.215-226.
Ozili, P.K., 2023. Central bank digital currency research around the World: a review of literature. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(2), pp.215-226.
Pichler, P., Summer, M. and Weber, B., 2019. Does digitalization require central bank digital currencies for the general public. OeNB Monetary Policy & The Economy Q, 4, pp.40-56.
Prates, M.M., 2021. Money in the twenty-first century: From rusty coins to digital currencies. Ohio St. Bus. LJ, 15, p.164.
Qian, Y., 2019. Central Bank Digital Currency: optimization of the currency system and its issuance design. China economic journal, 12(1), pp.1-15.
Rizk, A., 2022. Central bank digital currency: Legal and regulatory issues. In Central Bank Digital Currency: Legal and Regulatory Issues: Rizk, Andrew. [Sl]: SSRN.
ÅžANLISOY, S. and ÇiloÄŸlu, T., 2019. An investigation on the crypto currencies and its future. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 11(1), pp.69-88.
Tong, W. and Jiayou, C., 2021. A study of the economic impact of central bank digital currency under global competition. China Economic Journal, 14(1), pp.78-101.
Williamson, S., 2022. Central bank digital currency: Welfare and policy implications. Journal of Political Economy, 130(11), pp.2829-2861.
Yanagawa, N. and Yamaoka, H., 2019. Digital innovation, data revolution and central bank digital currency
You Might Also Like:
70+ Best Dissertation Topics for Accounting
1,212,718Orders
4.9/5Rating
5,063Experts
Turnitin Report
$10.00Proofreading and Editing
$9.00Per PageConsultation with Expert
$35.00Per HourLive Session 1-on-1
$40.00Per 30 min.Quality Check
$25.00Total
FreeGet
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Request Callback
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....
🚨Don't Leave Empty-Handed!🚨
Snag a Sweet 70% OFF on Your Assignments! 📚💡
Grab it while it's hot!🔥
Claim Your DiscountHurry, Offer Expires Soon 🚀🚀
+61 435 881 621
+61 435 881 621