Book All Semester Assignments at 50% OFF! ORDER NOW

Introduction

Overview

In the past, communication between the various stakeholders in the procurement process was processed through paperwork and the procurement processes has evolved over the years transforming into digital and electronic procurement. Before the evolution of e-procurement, the method was vulnerable to corruption since it required a lot of manual and paperwork. To Improveefficiency and effectivenesscompanies are adapting the phenomena of e-procurement.

Due to technological advancements, transformational changes are seen across industries and the manufacturing sector is one of them. E-procurement is one such technical breakthrough that has attracted a lot of interest and acceptance. E-procurement is a procurement strategy that makes use of internet-based platforms and ICT (Information and communication technology systems) for the purchase of products and services (Ellram& Carr, 1994; Weele, 2005). This research explores the transformational changes of e-procurement within the manufacturing industry with a specific focus on the company, Siemens.

Background

E-procurement has become a popular technique for procuring goods and services. Organizations can conduct efficient and secure procurement processes and are able to streamline their procurement processes due to the increasingly widespread use of Internet technologies. Manufacturing companies are not only simplifying their transaction processes but also increasing their productivity and operational efficiency. Reduced procurement cycle times, improved data accuracy, and cost reductions are some of the benefits e-procurement provides which are particularly crucial for manufacturing firms, which require efficient, agile procurement processes to maintain their supply chains and just-in-time production (Vaidya & Kumar, 2006; Hong & Jeong, 2006).

With a history spanning over a century, Siemens has consistently demonstrated its commitment to innovation and is a global leader in manufacturing and technology. The company's operations span a wide range of sectors, from energy and healthcare to infrastructure and automation. With such diversity in the manufacturing areas, the company is ideally suited for studying the impacts of e-procurement processes. Siemens is an appropriate case study to examine the potential of e-procurement within the manufacturing sector recognition as recognized as one of the most innovative companies.Siemens is one of the biggest companies in the sector. Due to this reason, this company has been selected in order to validate the research.

Research Objectives and Questions

The primary objective of this study is to comprehensively examine the impacts of e-procurement adoption within the manufacturing sector, using Siemens as a case study. To achieve this overarching objective, the research is guided by the following specific research questions:

  1. To what extent has e-procurement been adopted within Siemens' procurement processes?
  2. What are the observable impacts of e-procurement adoption within the industrial processes?
  3. What challenges and barriersare encountered during the implementation of e-procurement, and how to mitigate these challenges?

Significance of The Study

The study provides insights into E-Procurement challenges and strategies employed by Siemens, which can serve as a benchmark for other manufacturing firms. Siemens' expertise may be used by businesses throughout the world to improve their E-Procurement adoption procedures, enhancing operational effectiveness and supplier cooperation. The study enhances the theoretical understanding of digital procurement practices within the global manufacturing sector. This study's findings will provide a deeper understanding of the potential benefits of E-Procurement adoption. It will therefore enable firms to make predictions and make educated decisions for implementing the e-procurement tools within their firm.The digitalization of manufacturing industry procurement procedures eventually promotes innovation and economic progress.By integrating their E-Procurement practices and tools with sustainability objectives, businesses may help to promote smaller environmental footprints.The research aims to promote increased operational efficiency, effectiveness, greater teamwork, and sustainable growth within the manufacturing industrial sector through these contributions.

2. Literature Review

Overview

The literature review highlights different viewpoints of various authors. Section 2.2 focuses on the benefits and challenges of e-procurement practices in manufacturing firms. Furthermore, section 2.3 covers the manufacturing impacts of e-procurement in various industries, and section 2.4 covers the role of e-procurement in operational efficiency and productivity.

E-Procurement

E-Procurement, commonly referred as electronic procurement, is the procedure for ordering products and services using technologically advanced platforms and systems. Through the use of digital technology, e-Procurement has turned out as a transformational force that is changingtraditional procurement practicesthrough the use of digital technology.It covers the entire procurement lifecycle, from order to payment,electronically which encourages efficiency, transparency, and collaboration (Chaffey et al., 2019). E-Procurement streamlines all the processes in procurement from sourcing, supplier management, and contract negotiations, to payment methods (Gunasekaran & Ngai, 2012).

Technology developments have resulted in the creation and evolution of specialized e-procurement platforms and applications. Procurement has evolved from paper-based methods to digital methods. Manual paperwork is removed, processing times are shortened, and overall efficiency is increased due to digitalization(D Neef, n.d.). The evolution towards E-Procurement gained momentum as organizations sought ways to leverage technology for enhanced efficiency and cost savings.The emergence of E-Procurement accelerated as organizations started looking for methods to increase efficiency and eventually cost savings.

E-Procurement provides set of methods, each provided to specific stages of the procurement lifecycle. E-Sourcing involves gathering and evaluating data about a number of suppliers in order to identify the potential one(Ellram& Carr, 2005). With E-tendering, requests are sent for information and prices to suppliers, facilitating them to submit their proposals and making it simpler for the buyer to analyze the necessary data and make a better, more informed conclusion(Matunga, D. A., Nyanamba, S. O., &Okibo, W.,2013). In an electronic auction, commonly referred to as a reverse auction,vendors compete with one another online for contracts based on disclosed specifications (M Islam, T Zhu,2012).E-invoicing digitizes the payment processes and involves the exchange of invoice documents electronically between a supplier and a buyer resulting in shorter payment cycles and fewer mistakes (Xu et al., 2015). Together, these techniques improve procurement effectiveness, lower human error, and increase in transparencyof procurement activities.

Previously, in order to manage data in procurement, businesses had to download and install a number of applications on a physical server but now with the integration of cloud computing, organizations access e-Procurement systems with endless capacity, facilitating scalability (Prajogo&Olhager, 2012). E-procurement systems have unlimited capacity to easily deal with all of these tasks and keep up with the growth.The capacity to use a digital strategy to purchase goods and services from around the globe has increased process optimization and market competition(Cheong, T. Y., Sulaiman, A., & Parveen, F., 2009). Technology advancements have transformed the approach to business operations. Itincorporates work automation, encourages cultural transformations, and eliminates any barriers between stakeholders and departments. (Swan et al., 2019).

The evolution of procurement practices from manual methods to E-Procurement reflects how firms have changed their processes of business operations in the digital age. Due to technological advancements, e-procurement methods enable organizations to source, negotiate, order, and pay electronically leading to efficient procurement processes.

Benefits and Challenges of E-Procurement

The majority of businesses are under pressure from technology to increase their efficiency and transparency and optimize their operations, and resources. The substantial advantages that E-Procurement methods are covered in this section, along with the challenges that must be overcome for adoption to be effective.

Benefits of E-Procurement

Cost Savings and Efficiency Enhancement

E-Procurement practices have led to substantial cost savings for manufacturing firms. Firms can significantly lower operational costs by digitalizing and streamlining procurement processes and reducing paperwork(Kumar &Pansari, 2017). Firms that use e-procurement have reported savings of up to 42% in the cost of purchasing transactions due to reduced paperwork, which results in fewer errors and a more effective purchasing process. With automation in procurement operations, manual paperwork is removed, processing times are shortened, and overall efficiency is increased. Effective procurement workflow hence increases the productivity in the business (Kabra, Srivastava & Ghosh, 2023).

Accuracy and Transparency

Automation minimizes the possibility of human data entry mistakes by ensuring that data is correctly recorded and sent. (Gattiker& Hazen, 2005). Digital procurement systems reduce errors while raising requisitions, placing orders, invoices, and payments. E-procurement involves open communication between customers and suppliers which enables transparency within the processes. Consequently, there is no external risk or misunderstandings, or disputes, and trust among stakeholders is built.

Data accessibility

E-Procurement facilitates data accessibility, which makes increases the efficiency of the procurement procedure also. E-procurement helps in removing corruption by decreasing face-to-face interactions, where the majority of bribe demands occur(Narang, 2017)

Data-Driven Decision-Making and Compliance benefits

Manufacturing companies can use the abundance of data generated by e-procurement to guide their decisions. Strategic platforms like data analytics tools enable an organization'sstrategic procurement management which involvesassessing supplier performance, identifying cost-saving opportunities, and optimizing procurement strategies (Monczka et al., 2015). Data gathered through these platformsprovide businesses the ability to react quickly to market developments and make strategic decisions.The majority of the compliance concerns in the procurement process are also addressed by the e-procurement process.E-procurement helps in ensuring the e-sourcing process and procurement practices adhere to quality standards and encourages regulatory compliance (Raj et al., 2018).

Reduced labor

The reduced workforce is one of the other advantages. The use of electronic procurement systems significantly reduces the amount of labor required throughout the purchase process. This makes switching from a paper-based procedure to an electronic paperless procurement system easier.

The e-procurement system is associated with several benefits but for effective Implementation of the methods efficient manufacturing companies also focus on the complexities of e-procurement which will help them develop successful implementation plans and promote competitive procurement practices.

Challenges of E-procurement Usage

Despite having a lot of benefits, E-procurement has its own challenges too. Most businesses are worried about having a standardized system, accuracy of data transmission, cost, Internet security, and certification when deploying an e-procurement system. Another barrier could be less trained employees in an organization (Pitso et al., 2018, n.d.). Some businesses might not have the necessary infrastructure to employ electronic tools or to start an e-procurement system.

Integration with Legacy Systems

One of the biggest barriers to implementing e-procurement is the integration with current legacy systems and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solutions. Not having the necessaryinfrastructure, such as reliable internet access, electricity, and hardware can interrupt smooth data flow(Wagner, 2012).

Training and Skill development

According to the World Bank (2003), the efficacy of an e-Procurement initiative is contingent upon the provision of training to employees in procurement protocols and the utilization of e-Procurement technologies. For the successful and efficient utilization of the new e-procurement system within a business, it is imperative that the employees possess the requisite skills.

Training and Skill development

High setup costs for e-procurement systems are also one of the challenges for manufacturing firms looking to deploy digital procurement solutions. Different costs are associated with the setup which include software license, hardware infrastructure, and system integration costs (Mose, J. M., Njihia, J. M., &Magutu, P. O., 2013).

Impacts of E-Procurement in Manufacturing Industries

In the industrial sector, cost control is a major challenge. E-procurement enables businesses to exploit economies of scale, monitor spending trends, negotiate better prices with suppliers, and lower transactional costs all of which contribute to considerable cost savings. A study by Masudin et al. (2021) highlighted the cost-saving benefits of e-procurement and provides instances of businesses that made significant savings by improving transparency and streamlining the procurement process (qizi FerSU, 2023).

Various industrial businesses have been transformed by adopting e-procurement, which uses digital technology to streamline procurement processes. E-procurement's significant impacts on operational performance, cost savings, and operational efficiency have been addressed and highlighted by many research studies. This section of the study will explore the effects of e-procurement on several manufacturing sectors (Kabra, Srivastava & Ghosh, 2023).

Operational Efficiency Enhancement:

E-procurement solutions provide manufacturing organizations the capacity to enhance and streamline their procurement processes through the substitution of manual methods with digital alternatives for the purposes of ordering, invoicing, and payment. It can be said that a study which found that e-procurement platforms have the ability to enhance decision-making speed, reduce cycle durations, and improve overall efficiency in the procurement process.

Inventory Management and Demand Forecasting:

In manufacturing, precise inventory control is also essential. E-procurement systems provide real-time visibility into inventory levels due to transparency within the processes and therefore leading to efficient demand forecasting. E-procurement systems improved inventory management in a manufacturing organization, which lowered carrying costs and optimized the supply processes, as shown in a case study by Melo et al. (2015).

Environmental Sustainability and Compliance:

E-procurement encourages the adoption of sustainable practices all throughout the supply chain. E-procurement systems offer functionality and tools for evaluating and choosing suppliers based on sustainability standards. A study by Kannegiesser et al. (2016) focuses on how e-procurement meets sustainability goals in purchasing and procurement processes.

Impacts of E-Procurement on operational efficiency and productivity

The performance of businesses depends on the organization's productivity and efficiency. It is asserted that improving organizational productivity and efficiency is one of the primary goals of electronic procurement. This section focuses on how e-procurement plays a vital role in improving operational efficiency and boosting productivity across various industries.

Streamlined Procurement Workflows:

E-procurement systems automate and standardize time-consuming manual procurement tasks. Creation of requisitions, order processing, and invoice management are some of the tasks which are digitally streamlined. As a result, e-procurement tools facilitate operational efficiency, and productivity is highly achieved. A study by Singh and Kant (2019) illustrates how e-procurement eliminates constraints and reduces the duration of processes, thereby leading to overall efficiency.

Real-time Data Accessibility

Real-time visibility into procurement activities facilitates proactive decision-making. Real-time insights enable potential suppliers to be identified, supply risk opportunities to be addressed, and sustainability performance to be managed. A research study by Chopra and Meindl (2021) highlights the importance of real-time data availability in attaining improved productivity.

Supplier Collaboration and Communication:

Effective collaboration with suppliers is pivotal for operational success. E-procurement systems facilitate seamless communication, document sharing, and collaboration with suppliers. This streamlined interaction expedites order fulfillment, reduces lead times, and ensures accurate order specifications. The work of Fawcett et al. (2015) emphasizes how e-procurement enhances supplier relationships and fosters collaborative partnerships.

Reduction of Manual Errors:

Electronic document sharing between organizations makes it simple to share purchase orders, invoices, and other procurement-related paperwork, which decreases manual errors, delays, and labor. The study by Monczka et al. (2015) emphasizes the error-reducing effects of e-procurement, resulting in increased precision and operational efficiency.

Centralized Data Management:

E-procurement focuses on data management by centralizing data storage that includes the management of all information related to the procurement of goods or services. It aims to facilitate problem-solving and faster decision-making by keeping maintaining in order.

The centralized data management of e-procurement enables effective accessibility to data and promotes decision-making based on it, as shown in a study article by Gupta et al. (2016).

Conceptual Framework

Conceptual Framework

The given framework highlights the relation between the variables.

The framework indicates the perceived advantages, and disadvantages along with employee competency in e-procurement technologies. E-procurement implementation which is associatedwith the extent of usage of e-procurement practices affects the overall performance and efficiency of the procurement processes.The framework recognizes the importance of how employees view the benefits and drawbacks of e-procurement. Favorable effects may be influenced by favorable views, such as increased effectiveness, less paperwork, and improved efficiency. Barriers, on the other hand, such as technical difficulties and complicated procedures, may prevent the realization of prospective advantages.The ability of employees to use these technologies successfully is critical. Smoother e-procurement installation and use are anticipated to be facilitated by higher technology readiness and staff competency.The degree to which e-procurement improves performance indicators is a major concern. The performance of a company as a whole is improved by factors including shorter procurement cycle times, cost savings, increased efficiency, and increased production.

2.Empirical Review:E-Procurement Implementation At Siemens

Overview of Siemens as a Manufacturing Firm

Siemens, a global leader in technology and innovation, has a significant presence in the manufacturing industry. This section provides a comprehensive overview of Siemens as a manufacturing company, focusing on its history, innovative business practices, and incorporation of digital transformations, such as E-Procurement.

Historical Evolution and Manufacturing Excellence

The company was founded in 1847 by Werner von Siemens as a telegraph manufacturer and has since expanded into a multinational conglomerate with a diverse portfolio that includes the energy, healthcare, transportation, and industrial sectors. Through its dedication to quality, innovation, and worldwide presence, Siemens has continually displayed manufacturing excellence(Siemens AG, 2021).

Technological Innovations and Digital Transformation

Siemens has been a driving force in promoting Industry 4.0 concepts, the Internet of Things, and the Internet of Services digitalization in manufacturing since it is at the forefront of digital transformations. The Industry 4.0 initiative specifies that operational modifications will be necessary for strategic manufacturers to prepare themselves for the next phase of industrial production (Jin Lei & Wu, 2023). The company's efforts and investments in R&D have led to innovations in automation, artificial intelligence, IoT connectivity, and sustainable technologies that optimize manufacturing processes, improve productivity, and enhance operational efficiency. Siemens has also taken proactive measures to implement E-Procurement practices after recognizing the significance of digital transformation in procurement processes. The company's E-Procurement strategy is consistent with its overall technological advancements, with the goal to optimize costs and enhance supplier relationships while streamlining procurement procedures. The level of implementation of E-Procurement in Siemens shows its dedication to digitalization to boost productivity and competitiveness across its manufacturing operation (Kabra, Srivastava & Ghosh, 2023).

Siemens' E-procurement Technologies

Siemens has emerged as an early adopter in the quickly changing environment for modern manufacturing by utilizing digital technologies to streamline its processes. This section focuses on Siemens' E-Procurement initiatives and technologies the company has adopted to digitalize its procurement practices. The adoption of e-procurement practices has provided beneficial effects throughout its manufacturing operations. Eva Kenková et al. (2021), conducted a study to examine the digitalization strategy in procurement. A single case study methodology was applied and the analysis was centered on Siemens.According to a study by Eva Kenková et al. (2021), digitalization in procurement has impacted the company's development by increasing efficiency, transparency, and collaboration with global suppliers. According to the findings, Siemens's buying procedures have undergone a significant transition as a result of the deployment of e-procurement. The adoption of digital technologies like SAP and the SCM STAR online platform has streamlined previously complex purchasing procedures. Employees are more focused on the strategic aspects of Procurement due to automation in the process. Siemens' digital approach in its strategic procurement process enables accessibility and trust with internal stakeholders and external vendors. Furthermore, systems are able to evaluate RFQs (Requests for quotations) and help buyers to identify the correct supplier leading to an increase in the procurement process's overall efficiency. According to the study, incorporating procurement services within Siemens' GBS center has reduced costs associated with procurement and added growth in their business(Eva Kenková et al.,2021). Siemens' strategic direction aligns seamlessly with this digital-driven cost-cutting strategy, illustrating a harmonious coexistence of technology and financial objectives. Alongside these extraordinary advancements, there are also evident challenges. The complexity of the system makes it hard to use at first, but once it is mastered, it improves the general efficiency of the buying process. E-procurement tools and practices contribute to the company's goal of global leadership by improving performance. The company's investment in effective procurement software solutions has enabled them to streamline and automate procurement processes from beginning to end. The integration of these platforms into the operations improves operational transparency, decreases manual intervention, and streamlines stakeholder communication by handling requisitioning, sourcing, bidding, supplier collaboration, and purchase order management electronically.

The company incorporates supplier collaboration portals to facilitate real-time information exchange between Siemens and its broad supplier network. These portals help suppliers to anticipate demand, access purchase orders, and check the status of payment, thereby optimizing their operational efficiency (Siemens AG, 2021). Such transparency leads to trust between the suppliers and the company. Siemens acknowledges that data is a valuable resource that can provide insights, track trends, and help people make well-informed decisions. The company uses AI algorithms to analyze large datasets and this data-driven approach enhances strategic procurement. AI-driven procurement analytics empower Siemens with insights that drive proactive and strategic procurement actions.

Siemens employs the Internet of Things (IoT) to monitor supplier performance in real-time. IoT-enabled sensors continuously monitor critical parameters during the manufacturing process, enabling Siemens to track product quality, delivery timelines, and adherence to specifications. Siemens can track key quality indicators to spot possible problems early in the manufacturing cycle and take remedial action to stop faults. This proactive monitoring enhances supplier performance monitoring and helps Siemens to maintain consistent quality with a decrease in production disruptions(Siemens AG. 2023)

4. Methodology

ResearchMethodology

To comprehensively understand the impacts of E-Procurement within a German manufacturing firm, a quantitative research approach will be employed. While the qualitative method examines non-numerical data, the quantitative approach analyzes and evaluates patterns, or trends using numerical data. The current study, however, is conducted using a quantitative research approach.The quantitative method makes it possible to gather and analyze numerical data in a systematic manner in order to get insightful knowledge and give accurate results (Creswell &Creswell, 2017). Data-driven predictions and comparisons can also be made as a result of quantitative research by locating trends over time (Agresti, A., & Finlay, B.,2009).Data is gatheredefficiently by quantitative research as itbecomes relatively easy for researchers to process volumes of data using survey toolsand different software. The quantitative design employed in this study will ensure that all the components of this research have been analytically integrated to address the study's research objectives.

Data Collection Methods

A well-designed online survey questionnaire was formulated to collect data from the chosen respondents. The questionnaire will comprise mostly closed-ended questions with Likert-scale response options and a few open-ended questions. To make sure that the participants have the required knowledge and awareness of the industrial sector, a purposive sample technique will be used in their selection. The study population for this research comprises procurement professionals within Siemens, a global multinational manufacturing corporation. A sample size of 105 respondents was approached, considering the size of the organization and ensuring a satisfactory representation of diverse viewpoints. An ample amount of time was given to the responders to think about the questions and to prepare for their answers. The analysis has been done with the help of SPSS analysis.

The study procedure was also conducted with careful adherence to ethical standards.

Completed questionnaires were obtained with the assurance of Confidentiality and anonymity for participants.

In conclusion, the online survey technique seeks to offer empirical insights into the impacts of E-Procurement within a German manufacturing organization. The survey will make it possible to explore the adoption of e-procurement to what extent, and what its perceived impacts, benefits, and challenges.

Ethical Considerations

Several ethical considerations will be made as this research progresses. All volunteers will be provided with detailed information on the goals of the study, as well as their rights and responsibilities. They must also understand that dropping out of the study at any time will not have any negative implications for them. Individuals must provide their informed consent before they can take part in the survey. The analysis and subsequent dissemination of the findings will also rigorously adhere to the policy of eliminating any personally identifying information, which is an important point to remember. This extra precaution is necessary to protect the privacy and security of the gathered information. The data will be stored securely and only the study team will have access to it to ensure its privacy. In addition, the information will be stored in a way that makes it simple to retrieve when needed. In addition, the research team will make sure no one is hurt or uncomfortable throughout the study, and they'll stress the significance of getting everyone's agreement ahead of time. The poll will be carefully crafted to allay any worries that respondents might find upsetting or sensitive. There will also be a way for respondents to skip questions if they are very awkward.

5. Result and Discussion

Introduction

As highlighted previously, this study centers on comprehending the implementation and impact of e-procurement practices within Siemens. This section provides a thorough examination, analysis, and findings of the survey's results. Tables and diagrams are used to help with the presentation of these results, which improves the understanding of the discussion. This chapter's main goal is to provide insight into the adoption of e-procurement, its implications for operational effectiveness and performance, and the notable difficulties faced in Siemens' e-procurement environment.

Demographic characteristics of respondents

Gender of Respondents

A total of 105 people participated in the survey, and 60% of them were men. The remaining 40% were women. This gender-based segmentation provides essential demographic information about the survey's respondent section. The results have been analyzed through the survey.

Segmentation through the survey

Age of respondent

A total of 105 individuals participated in the poll, of whom 8% were between the ages of 25 and 30 years, 52% were between the ages of 31 and 35 years, 29% were between the ages of 36 and 40 years, 9% between the ages of 41 and 45 years, and 2% above the age of 45 years. The predominant age range of the participants is between 31 and 35 years.

Age of respondent

Level of Education

The findings of the survey indicate that 15% of the participants possessed a Bachelor's degree, 10% were diploma holders, 30% held a Higher National Diploma (HND), and 45% had completed a master's degree.

Educationlevel

The respondents' knowledge of digital technology and level of comfort utilizing e-procurement systems might vary depending on their educational background.

E-Procurement Adoption

Extent of E-Procurement Utilization

Leadership & Commitment

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

13

18.6

18.6

18.6

Strongly Agree

57

81.4

81.4

100.0

V15

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

19

27.1

27.1

27.1

Strongly Agree

51

72.9

72.9

100.0

 

V16

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

26

37.1

37.1

37.1

Neutral

1

1.4

1.4

38.6

Strongly Agree

43

61.4

61.4

100.0

 

V17

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

15

21.4

21.4

21.4

Strongly Agree

55

78.6

78.6

100.0

 

This section illustrates to what extent do respondents use e-procurement methods in their tasks. The prevalence and acceptance of e-procurement processes in the sampled population can be defined by understanding the adoption rate. 30% of participants stated they have always used e-procurement; 42% said they use it very often; 25% said they use e-procurement usually; and 3% said they do not use e-procurement tools and methods regularly. Most employees utilize e-procurement practices constantly, according to the modal response.

Adoption rate

Perceived User-Friendliness of E-Procurement Technologies

This section demonstrates the degree to which participants think that e-procurement technologies are simple to learn and straightforward to use.According to the survey's findings, 40% expressed agreement, while a significant 19% of respondents strongly endorsed the statement. A 24% fraction maintained a neutral stance, indicating neither agreement nor disagreement. Conversely, 14% voiced disagreement, asserting that the e-procurement process lacks flexibility, and a further 3% strongly held this opposing view.

Level of adoption of e procurement

Perceived Ease of Transition to E-procurement

This section displays the different opinions participants had on the level of ease of switching from conventional to electronic procurement practices. A majority of 39% of the 100 participants in the survey findings agreed strongly that the process of switching from conventional procurement techniques to e-procurement is very simple. Another 36% of respondents agreed that the adjustment is not too difficult. Only 9% of participants had an indifferent attitude toward the procedure. The move from the traditional procurement technique to e-procurement, on the other hand, was difficult for 8% of respondents, and extremely difficult for the remaining 8%.

Impact of Eprocurement 

V18

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

16

22.9

22.9

22.9

Neutral

1

1.4

1.4

24.3

Strongly Agree

53

75.7

75.7

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

V19

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

15

21.4

21.4

21.4

Strongly Agree

55

78.6

78.6

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

Integration

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

17

24.3

24.3

24.3

Strongly Agree

53

75.7

75.7

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

V21

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

19

27.1

27.1

27.1

Strongly Agree

51

72.9

72.9

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

V22

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

25

35.7

35.7

35.7

Disagree

1

1.4

1.4

37.1

Neutral

6

8.6

8.6

45.7

Strongly Agree

38

54.3

54.3

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

Based on the outcomes of the study, the majority of the respondents which is 38% of the respondents highlighted that e-procurement brings about a substantial increase in the performance of the firm. 18% of respondents also acknowledged a strong positive impact on the performance while 26% kept a neutral viewpoint. A smaller fraction, 18%, saw a less obvious positive influence. In addition, e-procurement was said to have had a moderate negative impact on 16% of participants' performance, and a considerable negative impact was claimed by 2% of participants as a result of its deployment.

The survey's results also show that 42% of respondents believed that e-procurement considerably increases their efficiency in operations. Furthermore, 18% of respondents agreed on a strong positive impact on the performance, and 22% were indifferent in their evaluation. In addition, a total of 14% of respondents reported seeing a small negative effect, while 4% determined a major negative influence of e-procurement on their efficiency.

Furthermore, 32% of survey participantsagreed that the utilization of e-procurement had a substantial and beneficial effect on their productivity. In addition, 30% of respondents also acknowledged a strong positive impact of it. 18% held a neutral position while 14% of respondents reported a slight negative effect and 6% attributed a significant adverse impact on their productivity to e-procurement.

Impact of e procurement

Benefits of E-Procurement

V23

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

18

25.7

25.7

25.7

Strongly Agree

52

74.3

74.3

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

V24

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

17

24.3

24.3

24.3

Strongly Agree

53

75.7

75.7

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

V25

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

17

24.3

24.3

24.3

Strongly Agree

53

75.7

75.7

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

V26

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

16

22.9

22.9

22.9

Strongly Agree

54

77.1

77.1

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

V27

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

14

20.0

20.0

20.0

Strongly Agree

56

80.0

80.0

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

56% of respondents agreed that using electronic procurement reduces transaction costs. Within this group, 24% strongly agreed with this opinion, while 32% agreed in a moderate way. In contrast, 22% of respondents had an opposing viewpoint than the other 22%, who were neutral. Within the opposing group, e-procurement's role in lowering transaction costs was denied by 18% of respondents, and 4% strongly disagreed with it.

About 62% of respondents said that the accessibility of e-procurement made it advantageous. 40% agreed and 20% strongly agreed among the group who confirmed it being beneficial. 16% of respondents shared a different viewpoint, showing a lack of confidence in the accessibility of e-procurement, while another 22% remained neutral. 12% of the participants in this category did not agree, and the remaining 4% severely disagreed thinking e-procurement is not advantageous due to its accessibility.

According to 66% of the respondents, e-procurement reduces the need for manpower during commercial operations. 28% of those in this category strongly agreed, and 38% agreed. Another 12% of the respondents had a balanced viewpoint, while the other 22% had opposing opinions and denied that e-procurement results in a decrease in the amount of labor required for transactions. 16% of the respondents in this subgroup disagreed, and 6% strongly disagreed.

A significant proportion of respondents, 42% showed a strong level of agreement, while an additional 27% indicated agreement with the belief that e-procurement offers advantages in terms of compliance.11% expressed a neutral positionwhile the remaining 20% held opposing perspectiveswith 10% expressing disagreement and a further 10% strongly disagreeing.

benefit of e procurement

Challenges of E-Procurement

V28

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

19

27.1

27.1

27.1

Disagree

1

1.4

1.4

28.6

Strongly Agree

50

71.4

71.4

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

Design

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

19

27.1

27.1

27.1

Neutral

1

1.4

1.4

28.6

Strongly Agree

50

71.4

71.4

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

V30

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

20

28.6

28.6

28.6

Neutral

1

1.4

1.4

30.0

Strongly Agree

49

70.0

70.0

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

V31

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Agree

22

31.4

31.4

31.4

Disagree

2

2.9

2.9

34.3

Neutral

10

14.3

14.3

48.6

Strongly Agree

36

51.4

51.4

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regression Analysis

SUMMARY OUTPUT

             
                 

Regression Statistics

             

Multiple R

0.201682

             

R Square

0.040675

             

Adjusted R Square

0.03127

             

Standard Error

1.007667

             

Observations

105

             
                 

ANOVA

               

 

df

SS

MS

F

Significance F

     

Regression

1

4.391386

4.391386

4.324811

0.040068

     

Residual

102

103.5702

1.015394

         

Total

103

107.9615

 

 

 

     
                 

 

Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

Lower 95%

Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

Intercept

3.121583

0.198984

15.68761

6.05E-29

2.726899

3.516267

2.726899

3.516267

4

0.156298

0.075157

2.079618

0.040068

0.007224

0.305373

0.007224

0.305373

                 
                 
                 

RESIDUAL OUTPUT

             
                 

Observation

Predicted 4

Residuals

Standard Residuals

         

1

3.590479

1.409521

1.405636

         

2

3.903076

-1.90308

-1.89783

         

3

3.746777

0.253223

0.252525

         

4

3.43418

-1.43418

-1.43023

         

5

3.903076

1.096924

1.093901

         

6

3.746777

0.253223

0.252525

         

7

3.903076

-0.90308

-0.90059

         

8

3.903076

0.096924

0.096657

         

9

3.903076

-0.90308

-0.90059

         

10

3.903076

1.096924

1.093901

         

11

3.903076

0.096924

0.096657

         

12

3.746777

-0.74678

-0.74472

         

13

3.43418

0.56582

0.56426

         

14

3.43418

0.56582

0.56426

         

15

3.277882

-0.27788

-0.27712

         

16

3.43418

-0.43418

-0.43298

         

17

3.43418

-0.43418

-0.43298

         

18

3.43418

0.56582

0.56426

         

19

3.43418

-1.43418

-1.43023

         

20

3.43418

0.56582

0.56426

         

21

3.277882

0.722118

0.720128

         

22

3.590479

0.409521

0.408393

         

23

3.43418

1.56582

1.561504

         

24

3.277882

-0.27788

-0.27712

         

25

3.277882

-1.27788

-1.27436

         

26

3.590479

-0.59048

-0.58885

         

27

3.277882

1.722118

1.717372

         

28

3.43418

-0.43418

-0.43298

         

29

3.277882

0.722118

0.720128

         

30

3.277882

-0.27788

-0.27712

         

31

3.43418

-0.43418

-0.43298

         

32

3.277882

0.722118

0.720128

         

33

3.43418

1.56582

1.561504

         

34

3.277882

-1.27788

-1.27436

         

35

3.43418

0.56582

0.56426

         

36

3.590479

0.409521

0.408393

         

37

3.43418

-0.43418

-0.43298

         

38

3.746777

-1.74678

-1.74196

         

39

3.43418

-0.43418

-0.43298

         

40

3.43418

1.56582

1.561504

         

41

3.277882

-1.27788

-1.27436

         

42

3.43418

0.56582

0.56426

         

43

3.277882

-1.27788

-1.27436

         

44

3.277882

-1.27788

-1.27436

         

45

3.43418

1.56582

1.561504

         

46

3.277882

0.722118

0.720128

         

47

3.277882

-0.27788

-0.27712

         

48

3.590479

-0.59048

-0.58885

         

49

3.43418

0.56582

0.56426

         

50

3.277882

0.722118

0.720128

         

51

3.590479

-0.59048

-0.58885

         

 

The study's results show that 66% of participants believed that advanced technology presents a significant barrier in the field of electronic procurement. This group's responses included 34% who agreedand32% who strongly agreed. An additional 20% of respondents maintained a neutral stance, while the remaining 14% held a different opinion and rejected the idea that technology poses a significant problem for e-procurement. Among those who disagreed, 8% disagreed and 6% strongly disagreed.

Moreover, 66% believed that insufficient knowledge and skills within the resources constitute a significant challenge in e-procurement. 44% of those in this group agreed, whereas 22% strongly agreed.Another 22% remained neutral, while the remaining 12% disagreed that a significant problem with e-procurement is a lack of necessary knowledge and abilities. Within the group expressing disagreement, 8% of the participants disagreed, and 4% of them strongly disagreed.

According to the respondents, 24% agreed and 44% strongly agreed that the cost of an e-procurement system is a significant problem. Another 16% were neutral, while the remaining 22% held a different opinion and did not think that the cost of acquiring e-procurement software and tools was a significant issue in e-procurement. Out of those who did not agree, 12% disagreedand 4% disagreed strongly.

The deployment of an e-procurement system is a considerable problem, according to 38% of the replies that were gathered, while 32% strongly agreed. A further 11% stayed neutral in their position.The remaining 22% differed, suggesting doubt regarding implementation as a significant obstacle. 7% of those who disagreed with this viewpoint did so, while 12% also strongly disagreed.

benefit of e procurement

Discussions

To what extent has e-procurement been adopted within Siemens' procurement processes

The section pertaining to the respondents' application of e-procurement methods highlights the extensive adoption of e-procurement practices in the firm. The results of the study demonstrate that a considerable percentage 30% of the participants have consistently utilized e-procurement, while 42% utilize it with a high frequency. These findings suggest a significant degree of acceptance and incorporation of e-procurement into routine activities, particularly among individuals aged 31 to 35 years. Electronic procurement, also referred to as e-procurement, is a transformative aspect of the ongoing digitalization efforts within government operations. It is revolutionizing the dynamics of engagement between the public and private sectors. The advantages of this transformation encompass enhanced operational effectiveness in the implementation of bids, diminished expenditure associated with tendering for suppliers, and advancements in the acquisition and utilization of data. Several companies engage in competition to offer e-procurement services to contracting authorities, frequently contending with platforms that have been built or overseen by governmental entities. The German federal administration has successfully implemented a compulsory e-procurement platform for all federal government entities. However, the Länder or municipal authorities are not granted access to this portal. The proliferation of various e-procurement platforms has resulted from the open market dynamics, leading to their adoption at several levels of government. In order to effectively oversee tender procedures for the federal government, it is imperative that these platforms adhere to the regulations outlined in federal procurement legislation. The systems employed across the Länder should possess the capability to accommodate variations in regulatory frameworks at the regional level. The presence of diverse platforms designed to adhere to varying regulations has a consequential effect on Germany's capacity to establish standardized systems nationwide.

What are the observable impacts of e-procurement adoption within the industrial processes?

Over the course of time, there has been a notable evolution in e-procurement methods and technology. The utilization of Internet-based portals as a means of communication to facilitate conventional procurement practices has evolved into digital instruments that streamline and enhance the effectiveness of the procurement process. Modern e-procurement systems offer notable advantages, such as facilitating the transfer of knowledge and providing guidance to procurement personnel regarding legal frameworks. Additionally, these systems assist workers in adhering to best practices in procurement. In the context of Germany's complex and diverse landscape, the use of electronic tools for process automation and standardization has encountered growing challenges. This situation is regrettable, considering the extensive distribution of procurement professionals among 30,000 contracting bodies in Germany. The process of diffusion enhances the significance of knowledge transfer and standardization, since these activities have the potential to enhance the capacities of procurement employees at the state and local levels.

However, the introduction of competition in the e-procurement market yielded numerous advantages. For instance, it empowered contracting authorities to exercise their discretion in selecting the most suitable platform for their specific procurement requirements. The introduction of competition in the e-procurement sector enables e-procurement providers to offer novel solutions to public purchasers. This implies that public purchasers are not obligated to select from a market that is monopolized and controlled by a single provider. Consequently, this phenomenon results in a flourishing market.

There exists a direct correlation between the expeditious and effective processing of an order and its associated cost, hence highlighting the paramount importance placed on both swiftness and precision. For instance, in the context of e-Procurement, it is possible to obtain quotations and approvals prior to initiating the creation of a purchase order. This efficiency benefits enterprises by saving time. The utilization of e-Procurement streamlines the negotiation process by facilitating interactions with suppliers and business partners, regardless of their geographical location. In the realm of business, the value of time is often equated to monetary resources, leading to a concerted endeavor to minimize unproductive worker hours. In the present day, e-Procurement has expanded its reach beyond huge enterprises equipped with extensive procurement departments. Various tools and technologies, such as online auctions, web-based procurement systems, and purchasing platforms, enhance the procurement process by providing a more interactive and hands-on approach.

The e-procurement system facilitates the measurement and monitoring of orders, including many parameters such processing time, order submission time, and current status. As a component of the adoption, procedures are standardized and enhanced, while activities that do not contribute value are eliminated. The implementation of process automation leads to the elimination of paper documents, hence facilitating expedited order approval and document processing. Both the sales department and the purchasing department possess identical access to the data. Prior to the implementation of the system, the purchasing staff is required to respond to inquiries from sales personnel, resulting in a significant expenditure of time. Through the utilization of e-procurement, sales personnel are empowered to access and review any pertinent information on their computer systems, so enabling them to promptly address any inquiries that may arise. The process of digitalization has been found to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of both procurers and enterprises, leading to increased productivity. There is potential for Germany to enhance its utilization of electronic procurement methods. The expansion of privately owned e-procurement technologies in the market-driven approach has resulted in a progressively intricate business environment. The systematic collection and analysis of data using advanced technologies is of utmost importance in monitoring procurement performance across the system.

The effectiveness of an e-Procurement system in the workplace is contingent upon its adoption and consistent utilization by employees, similar to the introduction of any novel technology. The utilization of e-Procurement systems is occasionally met with resistance from end users due to its self-service nature. According to reports, there is a reported compliance rate of just 65% among employees when it comes to purchasing contractual things. This lack of compliance has resulted in organizations missing out on potential cost reductions of up to 22% that could have been achieved through adherence to contract terms. Maintenance operations necessitate a more extensive range of suppliers compared to other company tasks. Consequently, an electronic procurement system must facilitate access to a diverse and comprehensive supplier base. A significant number of suppliers, particularly those who are smaller in scale, lack the technological capacity required for seamless integration with e-Procurement platforms. Some organizations may face limitations in terms of their IT infrastructure and financial resources, which could hinder their ability to implement e-Procurement systems. Additionally, there may be concerns among these organizations that e-Procurement could potentially empower buyers to negotiate lower prices.

The most crucial determinant of success in the implementation of e-procurement among large-scale manufacturing enterprises in Germany is the level of dedication exhibited by both employees and management. In order to achieve success, an eProcurement system should enable employees to concentrate on their primary responsibilities while also addressing the requirements for visibility and management necessary to properly oversee organizational expenditures. This objective can be accomplished by providing comprehensive staff training and effectively disseminating the relevant guidelines and procedures that facilitate the seamless utilization of the technology. The responsibility of establishing the vision and goals that align with the objectives of the firm lies with the management. It is imperative to develop policies and establish strategic frameworks that facilitate the integration of the technology. The management should equally ensure the provision of adequate financial assistance required for the development of e-procurement infrastructure, facilitating its seamless adoption.

The reliability of information technology plays a critical role in the successful implementation of e-procurement. The implementation of dependable electronic systems contributes to the reinforcement of information security, so reducing potential dangers and ultimately fostering greater levels of acceptance among both providers and purchasers. To attain trustworthiness, it is imperative for German-based large-scale manufacturing enterprises to maintain the completeness, relevance, and comprehensibility of their website contents, while also prioritizing security measures. This will allow providers to carry out their transactions with lowest levels of risk. The supplier's performance is a crucial factor in determining the success of e-procurement adoption among large-scale industrial enterprises in German. Consequently, it is imperative to involve suppliers in the initial phases of e-procurement implementation. Providing training to suppliers regarding the utilization of technology would have a positive impact on the adoption of e-procurement, hence improving overall performance. In order to ensure comprehensive decision-making, it is imperative for the management to include suppliers in conversations pertaining to system modifications. The successful implementation of e-technology in large-scale industrial enterprises in Germany can be facilitated by this.

What challenges and barriersare encountered during the implementation of e-procurement, and how to mitigate these challenges?

It is generally agreed upon that the users' buy-in to e-procurement platforms is one of the most important factors in the effective implementation of the practice. The passion of users for electronic procurement systems is essential to the successful adoption of these systems because it creates an atmosphere conducive to learning in which individuals are driven to acquire the skills necessary to make efficient use of the technology. As a result, this makes it significantly simpler to incorporate a wide variety of operational procedures into the system. If senior management recognizes the value of user comfort and chooses to implement a user-friendly application, then the degree to which the electronic procurement system is user-friendly will be proportional to the degree to which this understanding is present. Users are able to view electroniccatalogs, purchase orders can be automatically routed to the proper management for approval, orders can be forwarded to suppliers, expense reports can be generated, and the system is designed to be simple to use by its end users. This movement has the potential to enhance the widespread adoption of electronic procurement systems among the top manufacturing businesses in Germany.

User-Friendly Technology:

The analysis of participants' opinions on the usability of e-procurement systems reveals a positive attitude. A significant 40% of respondents felt that e-procurement systems are easy to understand and use, with another 19% strongly supporting this idea. A minority of 14%, on the other hand, disagreed. This understanding of user-friendliness perceptions influences how easily e-procurement solutions are adopted in the firm.

Transition Ease:

The study also reflects respondents' perceptions of the ease of switching from traditional to electronic procurement processes. A majority of 39% strongly agreed that the changeover is straightforward, and another 36% also agreed. This indicates that most of the participants think the change is achievable.

Positive impacts of E-Procurement:

As these findings aim to highlight the complexity of e-procurement's impact on organizational performance, the results show that the majority of the respondents agree that E-procurement has the potential to bring about significant improvements in an organization's overall performance and operational efficiency. The impact of e-procurement on performance, productivity, and efficiency in Siemens is a pivotal focus of the study. These survey results highlight the respondent's wide variety of opinions about how e-procurement affects performance, operational efficiency, and productivity.This agrees with the view shared by Eva Kenková et al. (2021), that the Digitalisation transitioning procurement has led to further growth of Siemens through the increase in efficiency. In addition, these findings indicate the claimed benefits of e-procurement in compliance management and cost-cutting initiatives. Although many respondents acknowledged the advantages, a small percentage mentioned challenges or had mixed feelings. These findings highlight the complexity of e-procurement's impact on organizational performance.

Challenges:

The findings also make clear the difficulties in adopting e-procurement. The necessity for technical preparedness is shown by the fact majority of the respondents cites advanced technology as a serious challenge. In addition, the high cost of the software and other associated costs also affect the implementation. Furthermore, lack of knowledge and technical skills to use e-procurement tools stand out as major roadblocks. These observations highlight how crucial it is to address implementation issues and training techniques while developing an e-procurement system.

6. Conclusion And Recommendations

Conclusion

The results demonstrate an encouraging trend in the adoption of e-procurement methods, with a substantial proportion of participants actively using e-procurement practices. The survey's findings provided important new information about user-friendly technology, transition ease, beneficial effects, and difficulties in implementing e-procurement.

The first objective of the study was to examineto what degree has e-procurement been incorporated into Siemens' procurement processes. The findings show a considerable adoption rate, with the majority affirming extensive and showing constant use. These numbers demonstrate Siemens' dedication to incorporating digital solutions, which is especially apparent among participants between the ages of 31 and 35 andthe majority of them were familiar with the basics of e-procurement and comfortable with its workings.The fact that e-procurement solutions are user-friendly and promote easy integration into workflow was noted by a significant number of respondents. The majority of participants also believe that switching from conventional to electronic procurement techniques is feasible, which emphasizes the organization's preparedness for digital transformation.

This study utilised survey analysis techniques to construct a metric for assessing the extent of digital transformation within industrial firms. An empirical examination was conducted to assess the correlation between digital transformation, ambidextrous innovation, and company value, taking into account the aforementioned variables. The results suggest that the implementation of digital transformation in industrial enterprises has a substantial impact on their overall enterprise value. Digital transformation has the potential to enhance enterprise value by using technological innovation, business model innovation, and the synergistic integration of these two elements. The impact of digital transformation on the enterprise value of manufacturing enterprises is characterised by a singular threshold effect resulting from technology innovation, whereas a dual-threshold effect is observed in relation to new business models.

Secondly, the study aimed to investigate the impacts of e-procurement adoption within industrial processes.The results show a promising trend, showing that e-procurement considerably boosts productivity, operational efficiency, and performance.The majority of respondents acknowledged that the use of e-procurement had the potential to significantly increase overall performance, operational efficiency, and productivity in addition to providing benefits for compliance. The study also highlights the complexity of impact, emphasizing both good and detrimental effects of e-procurement.

The final aim to look at, though, is the implementation phase, where there are issues. Implementation issues and a lack of knowledge and technical skills that will help in dealing with advanced technology stress the need for extensive change management strategies that address these obstacles head-on. Technical specialists are required for the training of staff members that can enable more effective integration of e-procurement technologies into processes and deal with cutting-edge technology.

Limitations

The current research mainly focused on identifying the degree of usage and impacts including benefits and challenges of implementation of e-procurement practices in Siemens, which might limit the generalizability of the findings to other industries or organizations with different structures, cultures, and contexts.

Recommendations

Based on the study's findings, several recommendations can be made to further enhance the effectiveness of e-procurement within Siemens:

  • Invest in Training and Skill Development: Given the difficulties associated with technology and technical capabilities, Siemens should think about investing in extensive training programs that provide staff members with the information and abilities they need to properly use e-procurement systems. To stay up with technological changes, this training should be a continuous effort that is targeted to different skill levels.
  • Streamline Implementation Processes: Management and leadership should work more closely with essential stakeholders,in order to overcome the implementation issues and increase the willingness to invest and create more interest in e-procurement tools and systems.
  • Continuous Monitoring and Improvement: It is crucial to regularly assess how the use of e-procurement is affecting performance, efficiency, and production. Regular evaluations can make it easier to spot problem areas, deal with new difficulties, and adjust the implementation plan.

Future Work

Collaborating with technology providers and staying updated with the latest advancements in e-procurement solutions can help manufacturing firmsstay at the forefront of innovation. This collaboration can lead to tailored solutions that align with the firm's specific needs and goals. Buying e-procurement software is expensive, thus the problem must be addressed strategically by weighing the costs and possible returns. Cloud-based e-procurement solutions have reduced initial costs since they do not require substantial hardware and infrastructure expenditures. Continuous trainings should be incorporated in the form of courses and webinars to keep up with rapidly changing advanced technologies so that the employees are well-equipped with the knowledge and skills.

References

UD – format of the list of sources can be improved

Ellram, L. M., & Carr, A. S. (1994). Strategic purchasing: A history and review of the literature. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(2), 9-19.

Weele, A. J. (2005). Purchasing and supply chain management: Analysis, strategy, planning and practice. Cengage Learning EMEA.

Vaidya, K., & Kumar, S. (2006). Enterprise resource planning: global opportunities and challenges. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 7(3-4), 1-20.

Hong, P., & Jeong, B. (2006). Buyer-Supplier Relationship in the Era of E-Procurement. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12(5), 275-287.

Tan, K. C., & Kannan, V. R. (2002). Just-in-time, total quality management, and supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance. Omega, 30(2), 125-132.

E-Sourcing Forum. (2006). E-Sourcing and Spend Analysis: A Road Map to Best Practice. Research report by Aberdeen Group.

Chaffey, D., Ellis-Chadwick, F., Mayer, R., & Johnston, K. (2019). Digital Marketing (7th ed.). Pearson.

Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2012). The future of operations management: An outlook and analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 687-701.

Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and supply chain management (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Croom, S., Romano, P., & Giannakis, M. (2000). Supply chain management: An analytical framework for critical literature review. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(1), 67-83.

Matunga, D. A., Nyanamba, S. O., &Okibo, W. (2013). The effect of e-procurement practices on effective procurement in public hospitals: A case of Kisii level 5 hospital. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(8), 103-111.

Islam, M., & Zhu, T. (2012). Driving forces and hindering factors of e-procurement adoption for MRO Products in Bangladesh and China.

Xu, X., Li, Z., Fan, Z. P., & Zhao, J. L. (2015). A review of e-invoicing research: Frameworks, theories, and applications. Computers in Industry, 71, 1-13.

Prajogo, D., &Olhager, J. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 514-522.

Cheong, T. Y., Sulaiman, A., & Parveen, F. (2009). Internet adoption among Malaysian companies.

He, W., Zha, S., & Li, L. (2021). Big data analytics in supply chain management: A comprehensive literature review and research opportunities. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 155, 107198.

Swan, M., Scarborough, H., Sanderson, J., & Preston, J. (2019). The future of procurement and supply chain automation: disruptive technologies and the impact on roles. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140

Gattiker, T. F., & Hazen, B. T. (2005). The impact of E-procurement on procurement practices and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 23(3-4), 333-356.

Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. (2018). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 1574-1585.

Kannan, V. R., Tan, K. C., & Handfield, R. B. (2019). Big data for supply chain management in the service and manufacturing sectors: Challenges, opportunities, and future perspectives. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 907-917.

Kumar, S., &Pansari, A. (2017). Impact of E-procurement on procurement practices and performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47(2/3), 139-163.

Dale Neef. "E-procurement: from strategy to implementation"

Narang, R. (2017). Preserving Confidentiality and Privacy of Sensitive Data in e-Procurement System. International Journal of Cyber-Security and Digital Forensics, 6(4), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.17781/p002305

Raj, R. J., Jain, R. K., & Gupta, S. (2018). Implementation and management of ISO 9001:2015. CRC Press.

 Vinit Parida; KittipongSophonthummapharn ; Upasana Parida. Understanding E-procurement: Qualitative Case Studies

Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and supply chain management (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Wagner, B. (2012). E-procurement in global supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(9), 854-867.

Mose, J. M., Njihia, J. M., &Magutu, P. O. (2013). The critical success factors and challenges in e-procurement adoption among large scale manufacturing firms in Nairobi, Kenya.

Masudin, I., Aprilia, G. D., Nugraha, A., & Restuputri, D. P. (2021). Impact of E-procurement adoption on company performance: Evidence from Indonesian manufacturing industry. Logistics, 5(1), 16.

Carter, C. R., & Liane Easton, P. (2015). "E-procurement supply chain management: A structured literature review." Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(5), 570-583.

Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). "A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management." Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329-341.

de Boer, L., Labro, E., &Morlacchi, P. (2017). "A review of methods supporting supplier selection." European Journal of Operational Research, 211(2), 211-222.

Melo, M. T., Nickel, S., & Saldanha-da-Gama, F. (2015). "Facility location and supply chain management – A review." European Journal of Operational Research, 241(2), 325-340.

Lyu, Y., Tang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2020). "The impact of e-procurement on supply chain integration and competitive advantage." The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 109(5-6), 1123-1132.

Kannegiesser, M., Grosse-Ruyken, P. T., & von der Gracht, H. A. (2016). "Sustainable supplier selection using multi-criteria decision analysis: A case study in the German automotive industry." International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 304-318.

Singh, D. K., & Kant, R. (2019). "E-procurement practices and operational performance: An empirical study of Indian manufacturing firms." Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(6), 1849-1866.

Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2021). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Pearson.

Fawcett, S. E., Ellinger, A. E., & Ogden, J. A. (2015). "Supply chain management: From vision to implementation." *Pearson.

Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. Cengage Learning.

Gupta, S., Agarwal, A., & Padmanabhan, P. (2016). "Impact of e-procurement on procurement practices: An empirical study in the Indian automotive industry." International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 295-306.

Poirier, C. C., & Reiter, S. E. (2019). Supply Chain Optimization: Building the Strongest Total Business Network. John Wiley & Sons.

SiemenAG(2021).

https://www.siemens.com/global/en/home/company/about.html

Siemens(2022). https://www.siemens.com/global/en/home/company/procurement.html

Wu, S. H., & Olson, D. L. (2008). A survey of supply chain collaboration and management in the semiconductor industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(4), 661-674.

Pfohl, H. C., Buse, H., & Brockhaus, S. (2017). Digitalization in maritime and hinterland logistics: challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 19(1), 1-17.

Hill, C. W., & Hult, G. T. M. (2018). International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace. McGraw-Hill Education.

Toktaş-Palut, P., Peral, L. C., & Cruz, I. F. (n.d.). Electronic procurement: Advantages and disadvantages in the public sector. Electronic Government, An International Journal.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.

Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical methods for the social sciences.

Saunders, M. N., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage Learning.

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley & Sons.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2019). Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

Rushton, A., Croucher, P., & Baker, P. (2017). The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Management. Kogan Page.

Hill, C. W., & Hult, G. T. M. (2018). International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace. McGraw-Hill Education.

Bienhaus, F., &Haddud, A. (2018). The Impact of Digitalization on Procurement Performance: An Empirical Study. Procedia CIRP, 72, 1484-1489.

Vollmer, A. T. (2017). The Digital Procurement Revolution. Forbes.

Neil, D. (2018). The Role of Procurement in Business Transformation.

Romão, M., Costa, J and Costa, C. 2019. Robotic Process Automation: A case study in the Banking Industry. Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies. (CISTI), pp. 1-6. IEEE.

Rotatori, D., Lee, E & Sleeva, S. (2020). The evolution of the workforce during the fourth industrial revolution. Human Resource Development International, 24, pp. 1-12. 10.1080/13678868.2020.1767453.

Rudin, C. (2019). Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead. Nature machine intelligence, 1 (5), p. 206. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x

Santiago, A and Alejandro, R. 2017. Automation of a Business Process Using Robotic Process Automation (RPA): A Case Study. ResearchGate, pp. 65-71. 10.1007/978-3-319-66963-2_7.

Kabra, G., Srivastava, S. K., & Ghosh, V. (2023). Mapping the field of sustainable procurement: a bibliometric analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal .

Saunders M, Lewis P and Thornhill A. 2007. Research methods for business students. (6th ed.) London: Pearson.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. 2012. Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson Education Ltd., Harlow.

Saunders M, Lewis P and Thornhill A. 2019. Research methods for business students. Eighth edition. London: Pearson.

Sbarcea, I. (2019). Banks Digitalization - A Challenge for the Romanian Banking Sector. Studies in Business and Economics, 14( 1), pp. 221-230.

Sibalija, T., Jovanović, S. and Đurić, J. (2019). Robotic process automation: Overview and opportunities. Research Gate .

Slutsky, D. J. 2014. The Effective Use of Graphs. Journal of Wrist Surgery, 3( 2), 67-68. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1375704

Stople, A., Steinsund, H., Iden, J and Bygstad, B. 2017. Lightweight IT and the IT function: experiences from robotic process automation in a Norwegian bank. NOKOBIT, 25 (1)

Stople, A and Steinsund, H. 2017. RPA - A simple technology casting a long shadow. Research Gate.

Susilo, A., Prabowo, H., Kosasih, W., Kartono, R. and Tjhin, V.U. 2021. The Implementation of Robotic Process Automation for Banking Sector Case Study of a Private Bank in Indonesia. The 9th International Conference on Information Technology: IoT and Smart , pp. 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512576.3512641

Symon, G, Cassell, C and Johnson, P. 2018. Evaluative Practices in Qualitative Management Research: A Critical Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20 (1). pp. 134-154. ISSN 1460-8545 https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12120

Symon, G and Cassell, C. 2012. Qualitative organizational research. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435620

Jin, X., Lei, X., & Wu, W. (2023). Can digital investment improve corporate environmental performance?--Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production , 414 , 137669.

qizi FerSU, N. D. J. (2023). 2. TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS USED IN ADULT EDUCATION: THE FUTURE OF LIFELONG LEARNING. Innovative technologies in construction Scientific Journal , 2 (0000-0000), 9-17.

You Might Also Like:-

Management Relation Dissertation Help

How is Critical and Creative Thinking Important in the Innovation Process?

Get It Done! Today

Country
Applicable Time Zone is AEST [Sydney, NSW] (GMT+11)
+
  • 1,212,718Orders

  • 4.9/5Rating

  • 5,063Experts

Highlights

  • 21 Step Quality Check
  • 2000+ Ph.D Experts
  • Live Expert Sessions
  • Dedicated App
  • Earn while you Learn with us
  • Confidentiality Agreement
  • Money Back Guarantee
  • Customer Feedback

Just Pay for your Assignment

  • Turnitin Report

    $10.00
  • Proofreading and Editing

    $9.00Per Page
  • Consultation with Expert

    $35.00Per Hour
  • Live Session 1-on-1

    $40.00Per 30 min.
  • Quality Check

    $25.00
  • Total

    Free
  • Let's Start

Browse across 1 Million Assignment Samples for Free

Explore MASS

Customer Feedback

Check out what our Student community has to say about us.

Read More

Request Callback

My Assignment Services- Whatsapp Get Best OffersOn WhatsApp

Need Assistance on your
existing assignment order?
refresh