Book All Semester Assignments at 50% OFF! ORDER NOW

Abstract

This study analyzes how flow, productivity, and customer happiness are managed in the service sector using the Theory of Speedy Even Flow (TSEF) and Queueing Theory. To demonstrate how these ideas may be used to analyse and enhance operations management, the case study of the Paramount Diner is presented. The assignment also looks at operational transparency, the effects of an unconventional seating policy, and the relationships between the design of an operation and the behaviour of its customers and employees. The assignment finishes by discussing the results' significance for operations management in service sectors, along with any open research questions and potential future study subjects. In the end, the project teaches students how to apply TSEF and queueing theory to the service sector and the value of taking into account how an operation's design affects how consumers and staff behave while managing operations.

Introduction

The Paramount Restaurant case study demonstrates the importance of controlling operations management flow and productivity for organisational performance. The case study demonstrates how workflow, queue management, and ineffective resource usage were causing the restaurant to struggle to run its business.

An organisation has to have strong operations management if it wants to be successful and competitive. In order to use resources effectively, optimise production processes, and satisfy consumer demand, operations managers are essential. In this situation, the café's operations manager must deal with a number of challenges, such as managing busy times, maximising the use of the facility's resources, and enhancing customer service (Chase et al., 2019).

The goal of this assignment is to look into the difficulties of the operations manager of the Paramount Diner and to provide suggestions for improving productivity and streamlining operations. In order to do this, This report will respond to five questions that will aid in our comprehension of the many facets of operations management and how they affect the operations of the restaurant.

It'll start by talking about the significance of operations management and how it relates to the case study of Paramount Diner. The restaurant's main operating difficulties will be emphasised in the second stage, along with how they effect productivity and flow. The restaurant's present operations management plan will next be evaluated, along with its advantages and disadvantages. Fourth, It’ll address the key issues facing the restaurant and enhance administration of operations. Lastly, It will think about how the profitability, productivity, and flow of the restaurant could alter as a result of our suggested modifications(Chase et al., 2019).

By this project, It will have a better understanding of the significance of efficient operations management in controlling flow and productivity across the board in corporate operations. By looking at the Paramount Diner case study, The restaurant's main operational issues will be pinpointed and provide solutions to enhance operations management and assist it in achieving its objectives.

Section I

Management of Flow Productivity

Productivity remains an essential feature that companies must engage in to maximize output. Flow productivity is all about the product cycle which must be well understood to avoid redundancy. The raw materials and the swiftness in which these products are converted into finished products relies on management of flow productivity. For that reason, it is important to understand the theory of swift and even flow.

Theory of Swift Even Flow (TSEF)

Definition and explanation of TSEF

The Theory of Swift Even Flow (TSEF) is a technique used in operations management to increase flow and productivity in a production or service system. The basic principle behind TSEF is to ensure that work flows through the system at a consistent and predictable rate, with little or no idle time, bottlenecks, or delays. This is achieved by carefully designing and balancing the flow of work, resources, and capacity across the different stages or processes in the system.

TSEF is based on several key principles, including:

Law of Variability:

This involves analyzing the flow of work, identifying any sources of variability or inefficiency, and taking steps to eliminate them. Examples of variability and waste include overproduction, waiting, defects, and unnecessary motion.

Law of Bottleneck

It claims that reducing bottlenecks or better managing bottlenecks can increase the productivity of an operation. If bottlenecks cannot be eliminated, however, productivity can be boosted by increasing capacity, allowing for more continuous output and, if necessary, a longer run time with fewer interruptions. Schmenner and Swink (1998). The 'theory of restrictions' (Goldratt, 1989) is related to this law.

Law of Scientific Method

According to the authors, the Scientific Management Movement's methods can increase worker output (Schmenner & Swink, 1998).

Simplifying and optimising processes is central to the Scientific Management Movement's theory of rising productivity (Taylor, 1911).

Law of Factory Focus

According to the work by Schmenner and Swink (1998), factories with fewer job sets tend to be more productive than those with more.

The Quality Law

Increasing quality in the end product's design or by a change in the product's material or processing is said to increase productivity, as does reducing waste. In cases where the material is nearly defect-free, however (Schmenner and Swink, 1998), it does not specify.

Section II

Fig 1:Process Flow Diagram for Paramount

Customers may have breakfast and lunch at the Paramount Diner. Its operational process may be broken down into many phases, starting with client arrival and ending with client departure. To analyse the restaurant process, a process flow diagram that shows all of the stages involved in running a business might be employed (Deming, 1986).

The procedure begins when the client enters the restaurant and is seated by the host. After taking the customer's order, the server transfers it to the kitchen. The serving staff presents the customer with their meal once it has been prepared in the kitchen and carried there. The consumer finishes their meal, settles their tab, and then exits the establishment.

Data may be gathered using a variety of approaches, such as time and motion studies, to identify the processing times for each stage of the process. This will make it easier to spot locations where adjustments might be made to speed up procedures and boost output (Deming, 1986).

The kitchen staff's preparation of the meal is the operation's bottleneck stage. This is because, in comparison to the other phases in the process, it requires the most time. By dividing the overall processing time by the quantity of units processed at that time, it is possible to get the cycle time for this step.

The restaurant may make adjustments, such as employing additional kitchen staff, reducing the menu, or improving kitchen equipment, to boost productivity and decrease customer wait times by determining the bottleneck step and the cycle time.

Calculation of average waiting time and customer queue length

It is needed to calculate the flow rate and customer arrival rates in order to do a more detailed examination of the Paramount Diner's functioning.

The number of consumers that travel through a certain place in a specific amount of time is known as the flow rate. Divide the total number of clients served in a particular period by the entire amount of time needed to serve them to get the flow

Rate (Gerchak & Gupta, 1992).

When a restaurant is open for 12 hours and serves 400 people each day, the flow rate is 400/12, or 33.33 customers per hour.

The number of patrons that visit the restaurant during a certain period of time is known as the customer arrival rate. Divide the total number of patrons by the total amount of time they spent in the restaurant to get the customer arrival rate.

Following formulas may be used to determine how long consumers will have to wait:

  1. According to Little's Law, the average number of customers in a system equals the average arrival rate times the average wait time. Mathematically, it may be written as L = W, where L stands for the usual number of customers, the arrival rate, and the usual wait time.
  2. Note from Kendall: This syntax is used to represent queueing systems and calculate waiting times. Three components make up the notation: A/B/C, where A denotes arrival rate, B denotes service rate, and C is the number of servers (Gershwin, 2000).

To adjust for customer balking (customers who leave the queue without being served) and customer renege (customers who leave the queue after waiting for some time), It is needed to adjust the customer arrival rate. The adjusted arrival rate can be calculated as λ = λ'/(1-P), where λ' is the original arrival rate, and P is the probability of balking or reneging.

It can determine the typical wait time and length of the customer queue using the aforementioned techniques and changes for baulking and reneging. With the use of this data, the restaurant's operations may be adjusted in order to decrease wait times and boost patron satisfaction.

Section III

Diners at the Paramount Diner are seated at a communal table rather than at separate tables, which is an uncommon seating arrangement. The enhancement of customer flow and reduction of wait times during peak hours were the objectives of the policy's implementation (Heizer & Render, 2016).

The unconventional seating arrangement has the benefit of making greater use of the available space. The community table enables more people to be seated in the same space as opposed to using several smaller tables. As it shortens wait times and the time it takes to seat clients, this is especially helpful when the restaurant is busy.

The programme also promotes customer social engagement, which is a benefit. Customers may feel more connected to one another and engage in greater conversation if they dine at a community table. This may improve the whole eating experience and maybe encourage consumers to come again.

The odd sitting configuration does have some drawbacks, however. Some clients may prefer to dine by themselves and might feel awkward talking to other people at a shared table. Some patrons could decide to dine somewhere else as a result of this.

Also, not every mealtime is appropriate for a communal table. Those celebrating a particular event or those searching for a romantic supper, for instance, may not choose the community table setup. The tactic could be less successful at slower times, when there are fewer patrons to occupy the communal table, leaving vacant seats that individual tables would have filled (Heizer & Render, 2016).

The Paramount Diner's odd seating arrangement has a variety of effects on patron and crew behaviour. Depending on the size of each group and the amount of open seats, customers are seated at tables. This helps to guarantee that tables are quickly filled since larger groups won't have to wait in vain for multiple smaller tables to open up. It also reduces the number of people asking for seats in certain dining areas, which might cause congestion and seating delays.

The policy has an impact on staff behaviour as well since it frees them up to concentrate on serving the tables they have been given rather than wasting time and energy setting up chairs. As a result, workers are able to perform more productively and effectively, which might boost income for the restaurant and client happiness.

Customers who prefer traditional seating arrangements where they may choose their own tables may find the Paramount Diner's odd seating layout to be less flexible or comfortable. Customers may feel they have less control over their eating experience as a consequence, which might lead to poorer customer satisfaction.

Yet, the tactic has the advantage of raising productivity and lowering wait times, which may be quite helpful in a busy restaurant setting. The strategy also makes sure that tables are full in a manner that maximises income for the restaurant, a crucial component of any company.

Overall, the Paramount Diner's unconventional seating arrangement is a useful tool for managing operations, improving the restaurant's production and efficiency. While the policy may have some unfavourable effects on consumer perception, the advantages in terms of revenue and customer happiness exceed these.

While designing the operation, the effect on employee behaviour should also be taken into account. A staff that is motivated and joyful is more likely to provide outstanding customer service and enhance the client experience as a whole. As a consequence, the Paramount Diner has to invest in training initiatives that help staff members acquire the abilities needed to provide top-notch service. Also, management should put in place incentive plans that reward and recognise workers for excellent work.

The Paramount Diner's success also depends on having a well-thought-out business plan (Liu & Tang, 2019). The restaurant may find areas for improvement and make adjustments that boost productivity, flow, and service quality by analysing the relationships between the operation design and customer-employee behaviours.

Section IV

The study of waiting lines, or queues, as well as the behaviour of consumers and systems in a queueing environment are both covered by the field of mathematics known as queueing theory (Hillier & Lieberman, 2013). With the prediction of queueing system behaviour and the provision of approaches for enhancing their effectiveness, queueing theory is utilised in operations management to optimise queueing system performance.

Queueing theory may be used to provide a wide range of performance measures that can be used to analyse the queueing system at the Paramount Restaurant. These are what they are:

The amount of people waiting in line at any one moment is shown by the average number of customers in line. It may be calculated using Little's Law, which says that the average number of customers in a system (N) equals the arrival rate () times the typical time a customer spends in the system (T) (W). N thus equals W.

Average time spent in line: This statistic calculates the average travel time of a consumer to the serving station. W = L/, where L is the average length of the line and is the arrival rate, may be used to compute it.

Probability that a consumer must wait in line: This establishes the length of time a customer must wait in line before receiving service. It may be roughly calculated using queuing models like the M/M/1 or M/M/c models that consider the arrival rate, service rate, and number of servers.

  1. The Paramount Diner may identify places where queueing might be improved and take the necessary steps to optimise its operations by evaluating these performance metrics.
  2. Customer happiness and personnel morale may be significantly impacted by queues in service operations. According to a research, consumer satisfaction may be influenced by how fair it feels to wait in line, with longer wait times corresponding to lower levels of satisfaction. Also, those in line may get agitated or anxious, which might ruin the whole experience.

While lines may have a negative impact on consumer satisfaction and personnel morale, this effect may be considerably mitigated through operational openness. If customers are made aware of the anticipated wait time and the cause for the delay, they could be more understanding and patient. Customers have the option of waiting in line or coming back at a later time, as shown by the Paramount Diner's practise of posting wait times on a whiteboard (Hillier & Lieberman, 2013).

If transparency lessens the perception of unfair queue management, workers may gain. If employees are educated to inform clients about the line and the anticipated wait time, they may feel less anxious and more in control. This could result in higher overall performance and more work satisfaction.

In addition to operational transparency, queueing theory may be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the queueing system and identify areas for improvement. Critical performance indicators include line length, utilisation rate, and average wait time. Service operations may identify system bottlenecks and take action to shorten wait times and increase overall efficiency by examining these metrics.

Lastly, in service operations, the psychological dynamics of lines may have a significant impact on personnel morale and customer satisfaction. Service operations may enhance the general customer experience and create a more enjoyable work environment for workers by introducing operational transparency requirements and using queueing theory to analyse performance (Horngren, Datar, & Rajan, 2018).

The Paramount Diner's operation design consists of many different elements, some of which include the restaurant layout, seating arrangement, menu layout, and customer service strategy. These factors interact with one another and have an impact on how consumers and staff behave (Jacobs et al., 2014).

The layout of the restaurant is intended to improve traffic flow for both employees and customers. The usage of communal tables in the seating arrangement promotes conversation among customers and creates a friendly environment. Customers take less time choosing what to eat due to the menu's simple layout. A courteous and customised approach to customer service, in the end, produces a favourable client experience.

These design components also affect how employees behave. For instance, staff members must handle several clients at once due to seating rules, which calls for a high degree of multitasking skills (Jacobs et al., 2014). To achieve the criteria for menu design and customer service philosophy, employees must be knowledgeable about the menu and capable of offering individualised advice and assistance.

The design of the business, together with the matching customer and staff behaviours, are intimately related and constantly changing. For instance, the seating arrangement may affect patron behaviour by encouraging them to converse and exercise greater restraint while waiting for a table. As a result, consumer satisfaction may rise and repeat business may grow. Similar to this, providing nice, personalised service could make consumers happy and staff morale higher.

Overall, the Paramount Diner's operations are meticulously controlled to maximise customer and employee flow while delivering a positive customer experience. The success of the restaurant depends on how the various design components interact with the related customer and staff behaviours.

The Paramount Diner's layout significantly affects its output, throughput, and level of service. A well-designed business may boost output, save expenses, and improve client happiness. On the other side, a badly planned business could cause bottlenecks, delays, and errors that are bad for both customers and staff (Krajewski et al., 2013).

A key component of the operational design is the eating area's arrangement. The Paramount Diner has an odd seating rule wherein patrons must take any available chairs. This strategy, although may improve flow and decrease wait times, may make customers who are forced to share tables with strangers feel uncomfortable and confused. So, a remodelling of the dining space can boost client pleasure while preserving the advantages of the special seating configuration.

The distribution of resources, such as personnel, equipment, and supplies, is a crucial aspect of operation design. The Paramount Restaurant should think about putting in place a cross-training programme that would enable staff to handle many tasks. By using this approach, operational flexibility may be increased while the demand for specialised people may decrease. To reduce waste and guarantee that goods are always accessible when required, the restaurant should also develop a better inventory management system (Krajewski et al., 2013).

Conclusion

Using ideas including the Theory of Fast Even Flow, process analysis, queueing theory, and operational transparency, this study evaluated the Paramount Diner case study from the perspective of operations management. In order for service operations to succeed, flow and productivity must be controlled. The research found that applying TSEF to service, manufacturing, healthcare, and operations management may help to increase flow and productivity.

The bottleneck phase, typical processing time, flow rate, and client arrival rates were emphasised in the study of the Paramount Diner operational process. The unconventional seating arrangement was shown to have both pros and negatives, including longer wait times and more stress on the employees as well as benefits like higher productivity and customer satisfaction. Also, the relationships between the operation's design and the pertinent staff and consumer behaviour were looked at.

It has been shown that in order to comprehend the psychological dynamics of lines and how they affect customer satisfaction and employee morale, queueing theory and operational transparency are essential. Optimizing the layout, streamlining the menu, and using technology to speed up the ordering process are some suggestions for enhancing the operation design.

References

Chase, R. B., Jacobs, F. R., & Aquilano, N. J. (2019). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage. McGraw-Hill Education.

Cooke, F. L., & Rohleder, T. R. (2006). Improving service operations through effective anticipation and response to peak demand periods. Journal of Operations Management, 24(6), 753-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.12.002

Corbett, C. J., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (1993). The impact of process variability on the performance of a serial production system. Management Science, 39(3), 353-366. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.3.353

Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business Press.

Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.

Gerchak, Y., & Gupta, D. (1992). Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review. Management Science, 38(9), 1184-1208. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.9.1184

Gershwin, S. B. (2000). Manufacturing systems engineering. Prentice Hall.

Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2016). Operations management: Sustainability and supply chain management. Pearson.

Hillier, F. S., & Lieberman, G. J. (2013). Introduction to operations research. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2018). Cost accounting: A managerial emphasis. Pearson.

Jacobs, F. R., Chase, R. B., & Lummus, R. R. (2014). Operations and supply chain management: The core. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Krajewski, L. J., Ritzman, L. P., & Malhotra, M. K. (2013). Operations management: Processes and supply chains. Pearson.

Liu, R., & Tang, J. (2019). Research on business model of internet catering based on value chain. International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science and Technology, 20(19), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5013/ijssst.a.20.19.01

Meredith, J. R., & Shafer, S. M. (2016). Operations management for MBAs. John Wiley & Sons.

Mollenkopf, D. A., & Closs, D. J. (2005). The hidden value in reverse logistics. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 116-127.

Ritzman, L. P., & Krajewski, L. J. (2015). Foundations of operations management. Pearson.

Slack, N., Brandon-Jones, A., & Johnston, R. (2016). Operations management. Pearson.

Stevenson, W. J. (2018). Operations management. McGraw-Hill Education.

You Might Also Like:-

Operations Management Dissertation Help

Top Business Management Dissertation Topics

Get It Done! Today

Country
Applicable Time Zone is AEST [Sydney, NSW] (GMT+11)
+
  • 1,212,718Orders

  • 4.9/5Rating

  • 5,063Experts

Highlights

  • 21 Step Quality Check
  • 2000+ Ph.D Experts
  • Live Expert Sessions
  • Dedicated App
  • Earn while you Learn with us
  • Confidentiality Agreement
  • Money Back Guarantee
  • Customer Feedback

Just Pay for your Assignment

  • Turnitin Report

    $10.00
  • Proofreading and Editing

    $9.00Per Page
  • Consultation with Expert

    $35.00Per Hour
  • Live Session 1-on-1

    $40.00Per 30 min.
  • Quality Check

    $25.00
  • Total

    Free
  • Let's Start

Browse across 1 Million Assignment Samples for Free

Explore MASS

Customer Feedback

Check out what our Student community has to say about us.

Read More

Request Callback

My Assignment Services- Whatsapp Get 50% + 20% EXTRAAADiscount on WhatsApp

Need Assistance on your
existing assignment order?
refresh