Community-based mental health care is a well-known way to tackling the issues related to the prevalence of mental illnesses and promoting mental health in the public in a successful and effective way. A plan for transitioning away from the conventional model of care focused on large psychiatric facilities and toward more community-centered services is so critical. There are numerous reasons why developing community-based mental health care is critical to enhancing mental health systems currently. Community care improves availability of services by allowing people with mental illnesses to keep familial connections, friendships, and work while undergoing treatment, hence promoting early intervention and psychosocial rehabilitation.
Community mental healthcare is connected with higher satisfaction among patients, enhanced compliance to therapy, stronger human rights security, and stigma reduction.
Community mental health care supports the development of a systematic relationship with basic medical services, which is critical in recognizing and providing therapy for individuals with mental problems. These collaborative care methods are especially effective in treating persons with both physical and mental co-morbidities.
Leading players from the nations taking part (Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the United Kingdom) collaborated with delegates of the appropriate European mental health organizations to create a plan for operation on community-based and socioeconomically inclusive solutions to mental health within the structure of the EU Joint Action on Mental Health and Wellbeing. Their study focused on the shift of persons with serious mental illnesses from institutional to community-based treatment, and it was part of a widely supported action strategy on mental well-being and health in Europe.
Mental and behavioral illnesses endanger people's life (Zhang et al., 2019). "General doctors serve an important role in the identification and treatment of mental illnesses" (Zhang et al., 2019, p.1). According to the statistics supplied, medical professionals served a total of 76,000 individuals with severe mental problems (Khaliq, 2020). However, twenty-three thousand of the seventy-six thousand individuals suffering from severe mental problems received therapy by medical professionals (Khaliq, 2020). The proportion of the twenty-three thousand users served by medical professionals is 38%. According to Martin-Perez et al. (2019), "Mental illness has a huge impact on the standard of life of patients and their loved ones, and a service plan that can offer those suffering from customized therapy focusing on clinical features, handicap, and social life is required." Despite the fact that medical professionals handle individuals who have serious mental illnesses, it is well recognized that mental illness patients face stigma while visiting general doctors (Castillejos-Anguiano, 2019). One would think that because of the patient's mental condition, medical professionals would have a more hopeful approach to their mentally ill patients, but multiple studies have demonstrated that this is not necessarily the situation (Castillejos-Anguiano, 2019). "Moreover, patients sense health personnel' negative attitudes, which may be a cause in the low level of interaction of individuals with serious illnesses with medical facilities" (Castillejos-Anguiano, 2019, p.1). In addition, patients with mental illnesses can be treated by doctors (Riley et al., 2018). Mental health disorders and suicide are more common among medical professionals (Riley et al., 2018).
According to Schomerus et al. (2018), "epidemiological research repeatedly demonstrate that most individuals with mental health conditions do not seek therapy for their illnesses, or do so only after significant latency" (p. 469). Some severe mental disorder patients delay medication since they are unwilling to be "labeled" with a serious mental condition (Schomerus et al., 2018). This is why they are scared that having a significant mental disease will have a detrimental impact on their schooling, profession, and goals that they wish to achieve. In addition, there are a variety of reasons why some people with severe mental illnesses opt to cope with their disease on their own (Stolzenburg et al., 2019).
One of the primary goals of health and social care is to improve the medical treatment and support of people with mental illnesses (Coffey et al., 2019). "As health-care costs keep on rising and mental illnesses become more common around the world, health-care professionals and suppliers will require accurate data on quality of care to determine the needs of the public and arrive at decisions on how to offer the best services, as well as utilize efficient approaches to enhance quality and minimize disparities" (Kilbourne et al., 2018, p. 30).
According to the statistics, the source effects of anticipated goals in Queensland for hospitalized acute beds are 20%, while there are only 17% currently available sources on the information (Khaliq, 2020). Furthermore, the suggested number of non-acute beds is 10%, despite the fact that existent or recent resources are 16.5 percent (Khaliq, 2020). The present staffing level in an ambulatory medical clinic is 70%, with 33% of the resources available (Khaliq, 2020). A study was undertaken on personnel at mental healthcare facilities in rural and urban areas (Han & Ku, 2019).
Rural inhabitants have traditionally had fewer options to mental healthcare and have documented poorer health conditions than their urban counterparts (Han & Ku, 2019). Mental health clinics serve an important role in providing behavioral health treatments to both rural and urban communities (Han & Ku, 2019). "The percentage of health facilities offering psychological medical services rose from forty-five percent in 2000 to eight-seven proportion in 2016" (Han & Ku, 2019, p.2061). The overall total of mental wellness center workers at healthcare centers was about four times more in 2016 than in 2006 (Han & Ku, 2019). Poor mental illness patients are concerned about financial assistance (Richardson et al., 2016).
The goal of medical facilities is "developing strategies and marketing health solutions to guarantee sufficient supply, shipment, and usage" (Khaliq, 2020, p. 246). There are two techniques, for example, a direct and indirect strategy to help healthcare management. The approach of guidance regarding healthcare growth and planning relates to the growth of planning organizations, community members, and other experts in the health care sector anchored in the marketplace together with the cost (Khaliq, 2020). Furthermore, direct healthcare planning is useful for appropriately establishing tactics or plans for reasonably cost, successful, and efficient healthcare (Khan et al., 2020). The financial expense that has contributed to the treatment of patients, for example, the materials that are used to care for their medical conditions, medical and food services, medicine prescribed, images for diagnosis, and rehabilitation. Karl and colleagues (2018). Preparing for inversion medical service, on the other hand, does not involve any sort of interaction from the patient in desire for treatment to the supplier in healthcare, with examples including medical records, providing free services such as helping others, and so on.
When offering services to patients, healthcare professionals must use the appropriate means to develop an effective function within the healthcare sector. As the healthcare industry evolves, so will the issues. Individuals working as a team are required for direct and indirect approaches of healthcare scheduling to be effective.
As community mental healthcare delivery evolved in England, outpatient clinics remained an integral aspect of psychiatric service offering and a significant resource for evaluation and follow-up. Other community-based solutions for individuals with mental illnesses were also being constructed, such as subsidized housing, daily services, and community-driven nurse practitioners and social service workers. Government measures such as 'Better Services for the Mentally Ill' and 'Care in the Community' fueled this growth.
There is a scarcity of precise accounts of the growth of grassroots efforts mental health treatments and the exact date of their debut throughout European nations. Following psychiatric change, there was a significant shortage of data in Sweden about the provision of hospital and community services. Although the procedure of deinstitutionalization began in the 1970s, significant health changes did not occur until the mid-1990s. The primary goal of this change, which began in 1995 with the passage of various Health and Social Care Acts, was to achieve social integration and enhance the standard of life for people with mental illnesses on par with the rest of the population. Over a four-year period, the federal authorities ordered the National Board of Health and Welfare to monitor and assess the effect of the psychiatric transformation. It discovered that roughly 70% of individuals with mental illnesses lived in their own residences, but the lines between the state and communities with regard to of rehabilitation programs for them were blurred.
The primary goal of these community amenities was to offer assistance to persons with long-term mental health difficulties, allowing long-term patients to be released and avoiding re-admissions. Following that, there was a partial transition from in-patient care in psychiatric hospitals to smaller specialized psychiatric medical centers during the next few years. In practically every region of Germany, new social services were established. However, the establishment of public mental health facilities was still in its early stages at the time, with substantial geographical heterogeneity already evident. According to certain data, nearly all regions served had some type of outpatient therapy by 1996; 90% had residential care facilities, day care, and scheduled events for persons with severe mental illnesses; two-thirds had conferences; and 18-84% had self-help.
Independent residing in shared apartments or single room tenancy with assistance from a local mental health agency are examples of supported housing. Residential care or residential facilities offer higher levels of on-site worker assistance. Following deinstitutionalisation, many residential residences were built, providing rehabilitation to enhance abilities for independent life before relocating to free housing. Non-hospital apartment buildings with fewer than 20 beds were built in Italy throughout the 1980s to offer alternative housing and a network of rehabilitation amenities. The PROGRES study revealed that these residential facilities differed widely between locations and mostly offered long-term lodging for patients over 65, with no full-time employees to offer intense therapy. They also had a limited resident turnover; approximately 31.5% of these home agencies had released any patients, implying that few fresh intakes were likely.
Regardless of the potential differences in the kinds of domestic and supported living facilities and the services they offer, they are likely to support a higher quality of life after being discharged from the hospital. A research of 213 long-term care facilities for adults with serious mental illness in ten European nations discovered that good assessments of these facilities were related to patients' autonomy, self-management, and care experiences. In regards to the standard of their therapeutic surroundings, hospital units rated worse than community units. Higher degrees of autonomy have also been seen in Sweden for small assisted residences (of up to seven individuals); and during acute phases of sickness, support can be raised to rates that occur in inpatient wards, which is more agreeable to inhabitants.
There is obviously a subset of people with serious mental disorders who need ongoing community assistance and treatment for their future requirements. The results for these individuals are typically favorable, but some are at risk of being excluded from their social circle, are at risk of restitution, and need secure housing. However, for this population, community home rehabilitation programs are an excellent alternative to mental hospitals/psychiatric hospitals/institutional care. In the United Kingdom, special emphasis has been made to the requirements of this group, as well as the need of investing in a local rehabilitation and assisted housing pathway that includes both inpatient and community institutions. This pathway takes a step-by-step approach to assisting people in gaining trust as well as abilities so that they can live in increasingly independent situations as they progress from higher to lower levels of care.
Castillejos Anguiano, M. C., Bordallo Aragón, A., Aguilera Fernández, D., & Moreno Küstner, B. (2019). Perceptions About Mental Illness Among General Practitioners. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 13(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-019-0284-9
Coffey, M., Hannigan, B., Barlow, S., Cartwright, M., Cohen, R., Faulkner, A., Jones, A., & Simpson, A. (2019). Recovery-Focused Mental Health Care Planning and Co-Ordination in Acute Inpatient Mental Health Settings: A Cross National Comparative Mixed Methods Study. BMC Psychiatry, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2094-7
Han, X., & Ku, L. (2019). Enhancing Staffing in Rural Community Health Centers Can Help Improve Behavioral Health Care. Health Affairs, 38(12), 2061–2068. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00823
Karl, F. M., Tremmel, M., Luzak, A., Schulz, H., Peters, A., Meisinger, C., Holle, R., & Laxy, M. (2018). Direct Healthcare Costs Associated with Device Assessed and Self-Reported Physical Activity: Results from a Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5906-7
Khaliq, A. A. (2020). Managerial epidemiology. (1st ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers. ISBN: 9781284082173
Khan, H. A., Knusel, K. D., Calabrese, J. R., & Salas-Vega, S. (2020). Direct Incremental Healthcare Costs Associated with Mood Disorders in the United States, 2007–2017. Journal of Affective Disorders, 273, 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.127
Kilbourne, A. M., Beck, K., Spaeth-Rublee, B., Ramanuj, P., O’Brien, R. W., Tomoyasu, N., & Pincus, H. A. (2018). Measuring and Improving the Quality of Mental Health Care: A Global Perspective. World Psychiatry, 17(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20482
Martín-Pérez, C., Herrero-Martin, J. J., Pérez-López, G., Pedrosa-García, R., Ibañez-Casas, I., Torres- González, F., & Moreno-Küstner, B. (2019). Severe Mental Illness in Community Mental Health Care in Spain. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 207(2), 106– 111. https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0000000000000929
Richardson, T., Elliott, P., Roberts, R., & Jansen, M. (2016). A Longitudinal Study of Financial Difficulties and Mental Health in a National Sample of British Undergraduate Students. Community Mental Health Journal, 53(3), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-016-0052-0
Riley, R., Spiers, J., Chew-Graham, C. A., Taylor, A. K., Thornton, G. A., & Buszewicz, M. (2018). ‘Treading Water but Drowning Slowly’: What Are GPs’ Experiences of Living and Working with Mental Illness and Distress in England? A Qualitative Study. BMJ Open, 8(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018620
Schomerus, G., Stolzenburg, S., Freitag, S., Speerforck, S., Janowitz, D., Evans-Lacko, S., Muehlan, H., & Schmidt, S. (2018). Stigma as a Barrier to Recognizing Personal Mental Illness and Seeking Help: A Prospective Study Among Untreated Persons with Mental Illness. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 269(4), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-018-0896-0
Stolzenburg, S., Freitag, S., Evans-Lacko, S., Speerforck, S., Schmidt, S., & Schomerus, G. (2018). Individuals with Currently Untreated Mental Illness: Causal Beliefs and Readiness to Seek Help. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 28(04), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796017000828
Zhang, H., Yu, D., Wang, Z., Shi, J., & Qian, J. (2019). What Impedes General Practitioners’ Identification of Mental Disorders at Outpatient Departments? A Qualitative Study in Shanghai, China. Annals of Global Health, 85(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2628
You May Also Like:
Mental Health Nursing Dissertation Help
Medical Law Dissertation Topics
1,212,718Orders
4.9/5Rating
5,063Experts
Turnitin Report
$10.00Proofreading and Editing
$9.00Per PageConsultation with Expert
$35.00Per HourLive Session 1-on-1
$40.00Per 30 min.Quality Check
$25.00Total
FreeGet
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Request Callback
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....
🚨Don't Leave Empty-Handed!🚨
Snag a Sweet 70% OFF on Your Assignments! 📚💡
Grab it while it's hot!🔥
Claim Your DiscountHurry, Offer Expires Soon 🚀🚀