This abstract presents the results and consequences of our research "Loan Prediction Using Machine Learning and Artificial Neural Networks." This study set out to use machine learning methods and artificial neural networks (ANNs) to build a reliable loan prediction model. The purpose of the model was to help financial organizations better forecast loan acceptance decisions based on a variety of application characteristics.
The constructed loan prediction model performed well, with an accuracy of 88.7 percent. With such a high percentage of right predictions, it's safe to assume that the model was able to help speed the loan approval process for many financial institutions.
The contribution of ANN is seen in how the model's prediction skills have increased after its incorporation. ANNs are particularly useful for loan prediction jobs because of their ability to recognise intricate patterns and non-linear correlations in the data.
The model's analysis revealed the most critical features in determining whether or not to approve a loan application. The importance of a borrower's credit history in determining their loan eligibility was reaffirmed. Predictability was also affected by parameters including income, loan amount, and work status.
Concerns of fairness and prejudice must be addressed, despite the fact that our model performed quite well. To provide fair and objective projections for all loan applicants, future research should concentrate on gathering more varied and representative datasets.
Faster and more precise lending institution decisions are made possible by incorporating the created model into the loan approval procedure. Lenders may speed up the acceptance of loans while maintaining a high standard of accuracy by automating the review process.
Lenders may use the model's prediction abilities to more accurately evaluate the creditworthiness of applicants and the likelihood of default. Financial institutions can reduce the risk of default and losses by making more informed lending choices thanks to this improved risk assessment capabilities.
Financial institutions may optimize their loan portfolios with more efficiency thanks to the model's capacity to detect high-risk borrowers. It is possible to reduce the likelihood of experiencing a loss and boost the portfolio's overall performance via the use of proactive risk management measures.
Through the use of Machine Learning and Artificial Neural Networks, we created a robust Loan Prediction Model for this research. Since ANNs are so good at recognizing patterns, this model is a helpful tool for banks that want to speed up the loan approval process and get a more accurate read on potential risks.
The algorithm has shown impressive performance, but it must be improved to guarantee that all loan applicants are treated fairly. Future studies could collect more inclusive data sets and include fairness metrics into the model's design.
Financial organisations may improve the speed, accuracy, and transparency of their loan approval processes by incorporating the established model into their operations. As a result, the institution's portfolio management and client satisfaction will increase, raising the institution's efficiency and making it more competitive in the lending market.
Predicting whether or not a borrower will be approved for a loan is an important challenge for banks since it affects the long-term viability of both the borrower and the lender. Historically, loan approval decisions have been made using inexact and sometimes biassed subjective evaluations and gut impressions (Teles et al,2020). There has been a long-standing need for a more objective and data-driven approach to determining loan eligibility, but recent advances in machine learning and artificial neural networks (ANN) hold enormous promise.
This research aims to investigate and use machine learning and ANN methods for loan eligibility prediction. We may build models that account for the applicant's income, employment history, credit score, and debt-to-income ratio by analyzing data from previously submitted loan applications. The objective is to provide a trustworthy and precise method through which loan officers may make accurate judgments. Predicting whether or not a borrower will be approved for a loan is a crucial function for banks and other lending organizations. The financial stability of both the borrower and the lender may rest on the decision to accept or refuse a loan application. When deciding whether or not to provide credit to an applicant, lenders must weigh many criteria, including that person's credit score, work history, and debt-to-income ratio. Conventional approaches to determining creditworthiness depend on the judgment and gut feelings of individuals, which may result in inaccuracies and prejudices.
Loan eligibility may be predicted using machine learning and artificial neural networks (ANN) by analyzing past loan application data(Ali et al, 2021). Lenders will be able to make more informed judgments and have less exposure to default if these techniques are used to determine loan eligibility.
In order to understand patterns and links between the applicant's attributes and loan acceptance, machine learning algorithms may analyze enormous datasets of loan applications and their results. In order to anticipate whether or not a loan application will be approved, these algorithms may be "trained" on data points including the applicant's income, job history, credit score, and debt-to-income ratio.
Loan eligibility prediction using machine learning often makes use of logistic regression or decision tree methods. Applying a logistic regression model to the process of deciding whether or not to provide a loan is a common use case (Kaur et al,2019). Each feature's coefficients are easily interpretable, and it works with both continuous and categorical data. In contrast, decision trees break down the input space into a series of rules for making decisions depending on those characteristics. Both continuous and categorical data may be processed by decision trees, and their interpretation is straightforward.
Loan eligibility prediction using ANN is yet another strong machine-learning approach. Layers of linked neurons in an ANN model translate input information into predicted outcomes. Loan eligibility forecasts may benefit from these models' ability to understand complicated patterns and correlations in the data. Tuning hyper parameters like the number of layers, the number of neurons per layer, and the learning rate may increase the performance of ANN models.
Predicting loan eligibility using machine learning and ANN is an important challenge for banks and financial organizations. Lenders will be able to make more informed judgments and have less exposure to default if these techniques are used to determine loan eligibility. Accurate and trustworthy loan eligibility forecasts need meticulous dataset selection and preprocessing, as well as the use of a suitable machine learning method.
Individuals, companies, and the economy as a whole all benefit greatly from easy access to credit. Loans for things like house purchases, higher education expenses, and company expansion are made possible in large part by financial organisations like banks. However, there are dangers involved in loan approval since the lender has to assess the applicant's creditworthiness in order to guarantee payback.
Decisions on who qualifies for loans have often been made manually and subjectively in the past, which may introduce errors and inefficiency (Sharma et al,2020). Credit ratings and work records are two of the few factors that lenders look at when deciding whether to provide a loan. Lenders and potential borrowers alike might lose out if this method doesn't accurately reflect an applicant's true financial strength.
Conventional approaches may also reinforce existing prejudices in financial lending. Evidence from the past reveals that members of marginalized groups, including minorities and women, have been subjected to discrimination while trying to get credit. Concerns about ethics aside, these prejudices make it harder for people to participate in and benefit from the economy.
Machine learning and artificial neural networks (ANN) have emerged as promising new tools for improving the process of predicting who would be eligible for a loan. Beyond standard credit ratings, elements that may be taken into account by machine learning algorithms include things like a borrower's income, debt-to-income ratio, job stability, and historical financial behaviour.
Machine learning algorithms may use data from the past to discover intricate patterns and correlations that have a role in the acceptance of loans. In addition, ANN models may learn to decipher complex interrelationships between characteristics, which might lead to more trustworthy loan eligibility forecasts.
Several advantages and disadvantages arise when using machine learning and ANN-based methods to the task of predicting loan eligibility. On the one hand, these methods have the potential to improve lending procedures in terms of efficiency, impartiality, and diversity. Predictive models may lessen the chance of loan default by increasing the precision with which approval decisions are made.
However, there are several factors to think about before introducing machine learning and ANN models into the banking and finance industry. Crucial stages in guaranteeing the model's efficacy include selecting the appropriate algorithm, preparing the data, and tweaking the hyper parameters. To further guarantee that these models do not perpetuate discriminatory lending practises, it is crucial to address ethical considerations connected to prejudice and fairness.
In order to better forecast who would be eligible for a loan, we need to close the gap between traditional lending practises and the promise of data-driven technology. Financial institutions may improve decision-making processes, promote economic inclusion, and contribute to a more stable and fair financial system if they take use of the potential given by machine learning and ANN to do so.
The focus of this study is on applying machine learning and ANN to improve loan eligibility prediction in the banking industry. The purpose of using sophisticated prediction algorithms to analyse past loan applications is to make more informed and equitable lending choices.
The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of several machine learning methods in predicting loan qualification. Logistic regression and decision trees are both useful tools for analyzing data, but they have their advantages and disadvantages when it comes to understanding the underlying patterns and correlations that ultimately lead to a loan being approved. Based on the findings, banks would be able to choose the best algorithm for their lending needs.
Artificial neural network models for loan eligibility prediction are the subject of this research question's fine-tuning. The performance of the ANN may be improved by tinkering with its hyperparameters, such as the number of layers, the number of neurons per layer, and the learning rate. To determine an ideal configuration for the ANN model, it is important to understand the effect of these hyperparameters.
How do the most important determinants of loan eligibility, as determined by machine learning algorithms, stack up against the more conventional criteria utilized by banks?
In order to answer this study topic, we will use machine learning models to discover the factors that matter most when deciding whether or not to grant a loan. We may evaluate how well data-driven forecasts line up with standard practices in the financial sector by comparing these findings to the traditional lending criteria utilized by banks and financial institutions. Insights on possible biases in the loan process might be gained by analyzing any discrepancies.
What are the results of using machine learning and ANN to forecast loan eligibility for various populations, and how does this affect fair lending?
This study's research topic investigates the problems of prejudice and fairness in determining loan qualification. Fair lending practices may be improved by analyzing model performance across different demographic groups (such as age, gender, and ethnicity). The probe is an attempt to make the loan approval procedure more open and fair.
This research subject is concerned with the application of prediction algorithms to actual loan scenarios. By foreseeing problems and developing solutions, we can streamline the process of incorporating machine learning and ANN models into preexisting infrastructure. In order for financial institutions to successfully embrace these technologies and gain the advantages of enhanced loan eligibility forecasts, they must first understand the practical ramifications.
In conclusion, the problems raised here provide light on fundamental facets of the use of machine learning and ANN methods for predicting loan eligibility. Insights gained by answering these questions can help financial institutions improve lending practises, increase fairness, and more effectively serve their customers.
The authors state that data cleaning and processing come first in the forecasting process, followed by experimental study of data sets, modeling, and finally model assessment and test data testing. The model of logistic regression has been run. With the original data set, the best accuracy was 0.811. Metrics like sensitivity and specificity are used to evaluate the relative merits of various models. The following findings resulted from the analysis. However, additional consumer characteristics should also be analyzed since they play a very essential role in lending choices and anticipating defaulters. The corporation does not seem to take into account other characteristics, such as a person's gender or marital status . A credit credibility soothsaying technology that aids businesses in reaching reliable conclusions about whether or not to approve visitors' credit requests. The banking diligence benefits from this because it creates viable avenues of distribution. This indicates that the system can prevent potential dangers in the future provided that the consumer has some minimal capacity for repayment. The basic data mining model has been evaluated, and improvements have been made by including other methodologies (using the Weka tool) (Kumar et al,2021). A credit status model is proposed by the author as a means of identifying likely loan applicants. When testing the suggested model to categorize loan applicants in R-Package, it achieved a score of 75.08. This interpretation might be used by lenders while doing mortgage business. In addition, many layers of iteration were used in comparative investigations. The replication position is a 30 foundational ANN model that provides superior nuance over other settings.
Large losses at marketable banks may be prevented with the use of this approach. In order to foretell Android apps, we deployed six machine learning categorization models. The model may be downloaded for free in the R programming language. All banking needs may be fulfilled using this application. The model's flaw is in its emphasis on relative importance; in reality, loans may be approved based on a single decisive factor, but this isn't conceivable within the framework of the model (Malakauskas et al,2021). This part has a wide variety of potential interfaces with other devices. The automated prediction system corrects the most crucial faults and characteristics in the information, and soon computers may be safer, more trustworthy, and more secure. Banking institutions rely heavily on risk assessment and forecasting to decide whether or not a loan application is suitable. Risk assessments are used in elementary and secondary schools to better understand potential dangers. Information gain theory is used to extract customer data and pick relevant features.
Each kind of credit receives its own rule-based prediction using previously established criteria. Both accepted and declined applications are graded as "Applicable" and "Not Applicable," respectively. The suggested technique has been proved to improve prediction accuracy and reduce computation time compared to state-of-the-art methods in corresponding experimental studies.
The primary goal of this layout is to forecast which clients will be repaid with a loan, since the lender must foresee the risk that the borrower will not be able to return the threat. Logistic rating regression outperforms random forests and decision trees, according to a study comparing the three models. Those with low credit scores are turned down, perhaps because they can afford to not pay (Teles et al,2020). The loan may be repaid in whole or in part in the event of a high-value applicant. The firm doesn't seem to be accepting of people of all sexual orientations and marital statuses.
The 5Cs (character, capacity, collateral, capital, and conditions) are the major emphasis of traditional financial institutions' subjective approaches to assessing borrowers' creditworthiness. Customers in rural locations, in particular, and those with little to no credit history or banking activity will not do well using this strategy. This approach also falls short of providing a complete portrait of a prospective borrower since important details necessary for a credit evaluation may be overlooked. As a result, financial institutions have begun using the digital technique of credit assessment in order to provide prospective borrowers with accurate information about their loan eligibility and to reduce the number of loans that end up as bad debt. The FICO score is based on the Fair Isaac Corporation's credit scoring system, which banks may either develop internally or outsource to a third party. The majority of financial institutions now use FICO scores to evaluate applicants' creditworthiness. One's creditworthiness is measured on a scale from 300 (very bad) to 850 (very good) points, with higher numbers indicating better credit. The primary weakness of conventional approaches is that they only contribute to the credit evaluation of the borrower without predicting the likelihood of default (Granström et al,2019). As a result, financial institutions are using ML technologies, which are mostly useful for predicting a borrower's repayment behaviour, in their credit evaluation processes.
Every day, we produce reams of data, therefore it's more important than ever to have reliable AI-ML-based models to help us organize, store, and make sense of all this information. Standard econometric model–like models based on logistic regression and ML–based models are bifurcating under the digital approaches for credit evaluation. Generalized line models (among the simplest are the ordinary least square technique and logistic regression), Bayesian models, ensemble models, support vector machines (SVM), and nearest-neighbor models are the most common types of ML-based models. The authors illustrated and evaluated several ML-based models using data from the 2014 Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) to make predictions about future loan demand. When compared to traditional econometric techniques, ML-based models that make advantage of the augmented features set have been demonstrated to have superior predictive ability. When compared to traditional econometric methods, ML-based models perform better on average for the enlarged feature set in terms of accuracy, recall, and precision. In order to resolve classification issues among various debtors, several previous investigations have underlined the relevance of ML-based models over regular econometric models. However, the appropriate model for a specific circumstance relies on the data that is readily available and the relevance of the forecast result to the individual or organization as a whole. It's also not always the case that an ML-based model would enhance prediction power; in many instances, it's been shown that traditional econometric techniques are more effective. Today, however, big data is being used by most organizations to address problems in the agriculture and food industries (Ibrahim et al,2020). Due to the limitations of traditional econometric models, ML-based models are preferable for handling huge data sets. Choices between ML-based and more traditional econometric approaches to determining a borrower's creditworthiness are heavily influenced by factors such as processing capacity, data sufficiency and availability, and research aims. It has been observed that the logistic regression model performs well under a cost-based valuation approach when the customer acquisition cost is high relative to the customer's potential value, and that the Gaussian Bayes model performs well when the customer acquisition cost is low relative to the customer's potential value. Thus, organisations shouldn't use ML models for credit scoring without considering the associated costs, model characteristics, and business goals.
Credit scoring, debt collection, and bad debt management are just a few examples of the numerous categorization issues that have been solved using logistic regression in previous studies. Although traditionally employed in data science categorization, artificial neural networks (ANN) have recently emerged as a useful tool in prediction analysis. In contrast, ANN excels exclusively in situations where numerical variables may be used. ANN is a common ML technique that uses networks of linked neurons with variable connection weights. Compared to the affinity analysis model, ANN stands out as having superior predictive ability. However, hybrid techniques that combine ANN and affinity analysis models provide greater predictive accuracy.
Predicting whether a loan application will be granted or refused by looking at past data on similar applications and a variety of applicant characteristics is known as loan eligibility prediction. Loan eligibility forecast in the financial sector has to be precise and trustworthy so that lenders may make educated selections (Zhu et al,2019). Accurate and efficient loan eligibility forecasts are now possible with the help of cutting-edge methods like machine learning and artificial neural networks.
Machine learning, a branch of AI, is concerned with creating programs that can analyze data and draw conclusions or make predictions without being explicitly programmed. Large datasets of loan applications and their results may be analyzed by machine learning algorithms, allowing for the prediction of loan eligibility. These algorithms are continuously learning and refining their models, so they can adapt and improve their predictions as new data becomes available.
Computing models that mimic the structure and behaviour of the human brain are known as artificial neural networks (ANN) (Orlova et al, 2020). Nodes, sometimes called neurons, are linked and arranged in layers. Each neuron in the network takes in some data, processes it, and then sends the output on to the next layer. Since ANNs excel in difficult pattern recognition tasks and are able to capture deep correlations between input variables, they are well-suited for loan eligibility prediction, which often comprises a large number of interconnected criteria.
For tasks requiring just two possible outcomes, known as binary classification problems, logistic regression is a useful statistical technique (Natasha et al, 2019). Logistic regression may be used to estimate the likelihood of granting a loan given a set of application characteristics and past loan data. Logistic regression examines the association between the independent variables and the outcome (loan approval status) to calculate coefficients that represent the magnitude and direction of effect of each feature on the loan eligibility prediction.
The machine learning approach known as a decision tree may be used to both classification and regression problems. Decision trees may be used in loan eligibility prediction to construct a structured set of criteria for evaluating loan applications. Each node in the decision tree stands for a feature, and each branch represents an outcome that might occur depending on the value of that characteristic. To better comprehend the criteria that determine loan qualification, decision trees may serve as a clear and comprehensible depiction of the decision-making process.
Logistic regression and decision trees are only two examples of the machine learning approaches that have found widespread usage in the field of loan eligibility prediction. Because of its ease of use and clear results, logistic regression is often applied (Li et al,2020). Lenders may become more transparent and data-driven by examining the coefficients to see how each feature influences the loan eligibility decision.
The popularity of decision trees, on the other hand, stems from the fact that they are easily interpretable and can be used to both numerical and categorical data. Decision trees simplify the process of predicting loan eligibility by reducing it to a set of criteria that can be easily understood and justified by lenders.
Furthermore, artificial neural networks' (ANN) ability to grasp complex patterns and correlations in the data has led to their rise in popularity in loan eligibility prediction. More accurate and nuanced loan eligibility forecasts are possible because ANNs can analyze enormous amounts of data and uncover hidden correlations between characteristics. The performance and generalizability of ANN models must be fine-tuned by adjusting hyper parameters like the number of layers and neurons.
Machine learning and artificial neural networks have become game-changing tools for predicting borrowers' ability to repay loans. These methods have the potential to expedite the loan approval process while simultaneously increasing its accuracy, efficiency, and fairness. Lenders may take use of the benefits of logistic regression, decision trees, and ANN models by combining them to provide more accurate, data-driven loan eligibility forecasts. Machine learning's application to loan eligibility prediction will be especially important in promoting inclusive and ethical lending practises as the financial industry continues to adopt data-driven technology.
This system learns from experience in the field to refine and implement new capabilities that have an impact on the dependent variables of interest.
Developed three brand-new features:
Figure 1 shows the combined income of the applicant and co-applicant, as described in the bivariate analysis. The likelihood of having a loan application approved increases as total income increases.
Borrower is responsible for paying back the loan. This metric is based on the premise that high achievers are more likely to be successful. The potential for EMI possess difficulties paying off their debts early.
A loan's monthly payment, or EMI, may be calculated by dividing the principal amount by the loan's outstanding balance.
Abandoned once EMI was paid. The rationale for include this factor in loan approval decisions is that higher loan-to-value ratios indicate that borrowers are more likely to responsibly repay their loans.
Due to its potential to revolutionize the lending process and enhance financial institutions' decision-making, research in the subject of loan eligibility prediction has attracted substantial interest. A comprehensive parametric comparison of several machine learning approaches in order to forecast mortgage loan default, making their work a standout among similar studies. The purpose of this research was to compare several methods for forecasting loan default, such as logistic regression, decision trees, and artificial neural networks.
The study by Ali et al. aimed to create a reliable and precise prediction model for spotting home loan default. Researchers hoped that by incorporating machine learning algorithms into the loan default risk prediction process, they may help lenders make more educated judgments and reduce losses.
The researchers were successful in their mission because of the large dataset they amassed of previously submitted home loan applications. Borrower income, credit score, loan amount, loan length, and job history were only few of the variables included in the dataset. For the purpose of training and testing the prediction models, we also incorporated data on whether or not a loan was overdue.
The research compared three different types of machine learning in depth using parametric analysis:
Researchers used assessment criteria including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score to assess the efficacy of the prediction models. Using these measures, they could evaluate the models' performance in predicting loan defaults by gauging how well they distinguished between mortgage loans in default and those that weren't.
All three machine learning methods performed well in forecasting home loan default, according to the research. In contrast to logistic regression and decision trees, the ANN model excelled in all metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score).
The ANN's enhanced prediction performance may be attributed to its capacity to recognize subtle relationships and patterns in the data. The ANN was able to efficiently understand the intricate connections between borrower characteristics and loan default risk because of the layered neural network architecture it used.
The role of features in loan default prediction was also emphasized. To help lenders make better judgments, the ANN model uncovered the most important variables influencing loan delinquency.
The findings have important implications for the financial lending sector. Considering the ANN model's higher performance, banks would do well to include cutting-edge machine learning methods into their loan eligibility prediction systems. Lenders may improve the safety of their loan portfolios and cut down on defaults by using ANN-based models to better predict the probability of delinquency.
The study also highlights data-driven decision making as an essential component of the financing process. Machine learning algorithms may examine a wider variety of parameters than traditional credit scoring systems, allowing for more precise forecasts. Financial organizations may provide more equitable and inclusive lending policies by making use of extensive borrower data.
The work of takes loan eligibility prediction to a whole new level (Rajendran et al,2021). Amongst all of the machine learning methods tested, the artificial neural network model performed the best in forecasting mortgage loan default. These results highlight the potential of cutting-edge data-driven techniques to radically alter the financial services sector by allowing financial institutions to make more educated and fair loan approval choices. Lenders may improve risk management, reduce losses, and boost economic stability by using machine learning models like ANN to assess prospective borrowers' creditworthiness.
Economic growth and financial inclusion rely heavily on people having access to credit, and this is particularly true in rural regions where typical credit scoring procedures may be less accessible. Machine learning technologies have recently emerged as useful tools for enhancing credit score and loan eligibility prediction in such unserved areas. To investigate the potential of machine learning models in improving digital credit scoring in rural finance, performed a thorough literature analysis. Using machine learning to provide financial services for rural people was the focus of this study, along with its goals of identifying major discoveries, difficulties, and possibilities in this sector.
A comprehensive search of the available databases and hand-picked the most relevant research articles, academic papers, and reports for their literature evaluation. Research subjects included a wide spectrum of digital credit scoring using machine learning applications, with an emphasis on rural finance situations. The purpose of this analysis was to make conclusions about the potential and usefulness of machine learning technologies for better loan eligibility prediction in rural regions by synthesizing and analyzing the data and insights from each chosen research.
The enhanced prediction accuracy attained by machine learning models in rural credit scoring was one of the important results noted in the literature study. However, the distinctive features of rural borrowers may not be captured by traditional credit scoring approaches, which generally depend on limited data and generic scoring models. When it comes to assessing credit risk, however, machine learning algorithms have the potential to make use of a far wider variety of data, including non-traditional indicators such as mobile phone use habits, agricultural activities, and social connections.
The literature study found that using machine learning for credit scoring in rural areas might enhance financial inclusion by providing access to credit to those who did not have it before. Machine learning algorithms may generate credit profiles for persons with limited formal financial histories by incorporating alternative data sources and non-traditional credit indicators.
The capacity of machine learning models to facilitate real-time credit determinations was also discovered to be a noteworthy discovery. Traditional credit evaluation methods may be time-consuming and difficult in remote locations where infrastructure and logistics may provide issues. However, due to the speed with which machine learning algorithms can process and analyse data, financial institutions may now give borrowers with prompt and efficient lending decisions, increasing both convenience and consumer happiness.
The potential of machine learning models to reduce bias in credit scoring was also noted in the review of relevant research. Traditional approaches to credit rating can reinforce prejudices against specific groups based on their demographic characteristics. In order to promote more equitable lending practices, machine learning algorithms may be trained to narrow in on creditworthiness factors.
Resistance to Change Climate, market, and seasonal changes all contribute to the instability of rural economies. The literature study revealed that, in comparison to conventional static credit scoring models, machine learning models demonstrate more flexibility and resilience when faced with dynamic settings. Lenders may make better-informed lending choices that reflect the shifting economic reality by continually updating and retraining the models with fresh data.
Several potential and obstacles related to using machine learning for digital credit scoring in rural finance were also uncovered by the literature research.
While large and varied data is essential to the success of machine learning and the production of reliable predictions, this resource may be scarce in rural regions. Acquisition of pertinent data for credit scoring purposes might be hampered by a lack of digital infrastructure, restricted internet access, and privacy issues.
When it comes to machine learning, it's common to think of models as "black boxes" with little to no explanation behind them. Explaining the reasoning behind these models' conclusions is key for gaining the trust of borrowers and financial institutions, which is especially important in the context of rural finance.
Careful thought is needed when validating the efficiency of machine learning models used for credit scoring in rural areas. In order to guarantee that the prediction models generalise properly and are not over fitting to particular datasets, the review emphasized the need of using rigorous model validation procedures.
The use of machine learning in credit rating also brings up questions of regulation and compliance (Aniceto et al,2020). It is critical for the continuation of moral lending practises to ensure that non-traditional indicators and alternative data sources are used in accordance with local and international rules.
The literature study conducted provides insight into the revolutionary potential of machine learning technologies in rural finance, specifically with regards to digital credit scoring and loan eligibility prediction. Improved forecast accuracy, wider access to credit, instant credit judgements, and the reduction of prejudice are all highlighted. However, issues with data availability, model interpretability, validation, and regulatory compliance are all highlighted.
For policymakers, financial institutions, and academics interested in using machine learning in rural finance, the insights presented by this literature review are invaluable. Stakeholders may design inclusive and responsible credit scoring models that contribute to long-term economic growth and the emancipation of rural communities if they address the problems and take advantage of the possibilities.
An appropriate strategy or concept of the workflow is essential before any ambitious project, such as the one done for this article, since the smallest of overlooked elements might lead to outcomes that can prove to be less than desirable. Selecting a dataset with the right quantity and quality of data is the first stage in writing a Machine Learning-based paper like the one being presented. Second, ML algorithms for predicting the target variable are chosen, the dataset is prepared, the dataset is split into training and testing sets, the algorithms are trained, and the predicted values are compared to the ones in the test set. After all that is done, it is important to see whether further pre-processing improves the projected values in order to make sure the algorithms perform as efficiently as possible. The article would benefit even more by a user-interactive demonstration of the credit risk associated with freshly provided data and an investigation of the accuracy of ML algorithms. For your convenience, we've included a figure depicting the aforementioned procedures.
Suggested model relies on data from Kaggle, which includes the loan histories of 82,000 people who have bank accounts. The supplied credit train dataset was utilized after being partitioned into a training set of 80% and a testing set of 20%. In this case, there are a total of 19 "features" in the dataset, or columns, that include different pieces of information about each user. Each record contains two unique identifiers—"Customer ID" and "Loan ID"—that serve to track individual transactions. There are two distinct object type variables listed under the "Loan Status" heading of an account: "Fully Paid" indicates that the amount borrowed has been repaid in full, while "Charged off" indicates that the creditor has given up hope of being repaid. The "Current loan amount," "Term," and "Credit Score" features provide additional information on an account, including the amount still owed on any loans, the loan's original term length, and the account's credit score (a higher number is better). Other characteristics in the dataset are likewise quite self-explanatory.
In addition, "Loan Status" was chosen as the dependent variable; account holders who have repaid their loans in full (coded as 1) are deemed eligible for further loans, while those whose debts have been charged off (coded as 0) are not.
Initial inspection of the dataset reveals that although there is sufficient data for credit risk prediction. However, not all of the data inside the dataset was prepared to be presented in the figure for straightforward visualization.
Kaggle provided the dataset utilized for this paper's suggested model, which includes the bank loan status of 82,000 bank account owners [17]. The supplied credit train dataset was utilized, and it was partitioned into a training set of 80% and a testing set of 20% (Jan et al,2021). In this case, there are a total of 19 "features" in the dataset, or columns, that include different pieces of information about each user. The "Customer ID" and "Loan ID" fields in each account are used to track and identify specific customers and loans. Following this is a section labelled "Loan Status," which indicates whether or not a loan has been paid back in full or whether the creditor has given up hope of being repaid. This section contains two object type variables: "Fully Paid" indicates that the amount borrowed has been repaid in full, while "Charged off" indicates that the creditor has given up hope of being repaid. The "Current loan amount," "Term," and "Credit Score" features provide further information on a loan's status and its terms, as well as the account's credit score (a higher number is preferable). The dataset also includes additional characteristics that need no explanation.
In addition, "Loan Status" was selected as the dependent variable; account holders who repaid their debts in full (coded as 1) are deemed creditworthy, whereas those whose loans were charged off (coded as 0) are not.
Upon initial inspection, it is clear that although the dataset has enough information for credit risk prediction, the data included inside the dataset was not necessarily suitable to train a machine learning algorithm and required tuning.
Therefore, the dataset required some elementary data pre-processing, as will be explained below, before it could be used for training.
The dataset contains object-type variables in certain columns, which may be encoded using feature encoding. This is because certain machine learning algorithms cannot be taught with string variables. Numerical values were needed to train the ML algorithms, therefore the values in the columns labelled "Loan Status," "Term," "Years in current job," "Home Ownership," and "Purpose" had to be encoded (Belhadi et al,2021). Given that each of these columns had a distinct value, it was necessary to assign a unique integer to each distinct string.
The total number of null values in each column was counted, and the result was that every column included at least 514 invalid entries. Since null values prevent ML algorithms from being trained, practically all of them were imputed with the mean value of all the data in the relevant columns (the rationale for this will be discussed in the feature selection section).
After the data was encoded and imputed, it became clear that several columns included disproportionately large numeric values. To ensure that no one column was given greater weight than the others during training the algorithms, all values were normalised to fall within the range 0–1. A user's Credit Score and Annual Income account for 40-60% of the algorithms' forecasts, respectively. Therefore, the prediction outcome is heavily influenced by these characteristics. Even when missing values are imputed using the mean, median, etc., the method still performs poorly when dealing with null inputs on these two characteristics. It was discovered that using these values often reduced performance by around 3% to 4% across the board depending on the imputation technique used. This is why we eliminated certain columns from the dataset of interest to strengthen the reliability of the forecast.
There were columns or characteristics in the dataset that were deemed unnecessary or problematic while trying to train a machine learning model. Some fields in the dataset, such "Customer ID" and "Loan ID," were omitted since they were not thought to be helpful in training the chosen algorithms. In addition, the decision to remove the column "Months since last delinquent" was taken with the use of the correlation matrix and heatmap since it had a low degree of connection to the target column "Loan Status" also had over fifty percent null values. Therefore, the characteristics with the highest correlation were chosen above those with lower correlation. The heatmap in Figure is a visual depiction of feature correlation.
Ali, S. E. A., Rizvi, S. S. H., Fong-Woon, L., Rao, F. A., & Jan, A. A. (2021). Predicting delinquency on Mortgage loans: an exhaustive parametric comparison of machine learning techniques. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management , 12 (1), 1.
Kumar, A., Sharma, S., &Mahdavi, M. (2021). Machine learning (ML) technologies for digital credit scoring in rural finance: A literature review. Risks , 9 (11), 192.
Malakauskas, A., &LakštutienÄ—, A. (2021). Financial distress prediction for small and medium enterprises using machine learning techniques. Engineering Economics , 32 (1), 4-14.
Teles, G., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Rabê, R. A., &Kozlov, S. A. (2020). Artificial neural network and Bayesian network models for credit risk prediction. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Systems , 2 (1), 118-132.
Granström, D., &Abrahamsson, J. (2019). Loan default prediction using supervised machine learning algorithms.
Ibrahim, A. A., Ridwan, R. L., Muhammed, M. M., Abdulaziz, R. O., & Saheed, G. A. (2020). Comparison of the CatBoost classifier with other machine learning methods. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications , 11 (11).
Zhu, Y., Zhou, L., Xie, C., Wang, G. J., & Nguyen, T. V. (2019). Forecasting SMEs' credit risk in supply chain finance with an enhanced hybrid ensemble machine learning approach. International Journal of Production Economics , 211 , 22-33.
Orlova, E. V. (2020). Decision-making techniques for credit resource management using machine learning and optimization. Information , 11 (3), 144.
Natasha, A., Prastyo, D. D., & Suhartono, S. (2019, December). Credit scoring to classify consumer loan using machine learning. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2194, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
Li, J. P., Mirza, N., Rahat, B., & Xiong, D. (2020). Machine learning and credit ratings prediction in the age of fourth industrial revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 161 , 120309.
Teles, G., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Rabê, R. A., & Kozlov, S. A. (2020). Artificial neural network and Bayesian network models for credit risk prediction. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Systems , 2 (1), 118-132.
Belhadi, A., Kamble, S. S., Mani, V., Benkhati, I., & Touriki, F. E. (2021). An ensemble machine learning approach for forecasting credit risk of agricultural SMEs’ investments in agriculture 4.0 through supply chain finance. Annals of Operations Research , 1-29.
Elfanagely, O., Toyoda, Y., Othman, S., Mellia, J. A., Basta, M., Liu, T., ... & Fischer, J. P. (2021). Machine learning and surgical outcomes prediction: a systematic review. Journal of Surgical Research , 264 , 346-361.
Aniceto, M. C., Barboza, F., & Kimura, H. (2020). Machine learning predictivity applied to consumer creditworthiness. Future Business Journal , 6 (1), 1-14.
Jing, J. (2020). Big data analysis and empirical research on the financing and investment decision of companies after COVID-19 epidemic situation based on deep learning. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems , 39 (6), 8877-8886.
Addo, P. M., Guegan, D., & Hassani, B. (2018). Credit risk analysis using machine and deep learning models. Risks , 6 (2), 38.
Dastile, X., Celik, T., & Potsane, M. (2020). Statistical and machine learning models in credit scoring: A systematic literature survey. Applied Soft Computing , 91 , 106263.
Jan, C. L. (2021). Financial information asymmetry: Using deep learning algorithms to predict financial distress. Symmetry , 13 (3), 443.
Kaur, H., Pannu, H. S., & Malhi, A. K. (2019). A systematic review on imbalanced data challenges in machine learning: Applications and solutions. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , 52 (4), 1-36.
Vaidya, A. (2017, July). Predictive and probabilistic approach using logistic regression: Application to prediction of loan approval. In 2017 8th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Sharma, A., & Wehrheim, H. (2020, July). Higher income, larger loan? monotonicity testing of machine learning models. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (pp. 200-210).
Appiahene, P., Missah, Y. M., & Najim, U. (2020). Predicting bank operational efficiency using machine learning algorithm: comparative study of decision tree, random forest, and neural networks. Advances in fuzzy systems , 2020 , 1-12.
Rajendran, S., Srinivas, S., & Grimshaw, T. (2021). Predicting demand for air taxi urban aviation services using machine learning algorithms. Journal of Air Transport Management , 92 , 102043.
Canhoto, A. I. (2021). Leveraging machine learning in the global fight against money laundering and terrorism financing: An affordances perspective. Journal of business research , 131 , 441-452.
Hafeez, G., Alimgeer, K. S., Wadud, Z., Shafiq, Z., Ali Khan, M. U., Khan, I., ... & Derhab, A. (2020). A novel accurate and fast converging deep learning-based model for electrical energy consumption forecasting in a smart grid. Energies , 13 (9), 2244.
You Might Also Like:-
Help with Dissertation Writing Paper
70+ Trending Business Analytics Dissertation Topics
Impact of Digital Currency on Monetary Policy of Central Bank of United Kingdom Dissertation Answer
1,212,718Orders
4.9/5Rating
5,063Experts
Turnitin Report
$10.00Proofreading and Editing
$9.00Per PageConsultation with Expert
$35.00Per HourLive Session 1-on-1
$40.00Per 30 min.Quality Check
$25.00Total
FreeGet
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Request Callback
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....
🚨Don't Leave Empty-Handed!🚨
Snag a Sweet 70% OFF on Your Assignments! 📚💡
Grab it while it's hot!🔥
Claim Your DiscountHurry, Offer Expires Soon 🚀🚀