- Report explainedmatch by match
- Draft + reportwhat you send
- Action listwhat you get
- 24–48 hrsusual turnaround
What we check
A similarity percentage on its own tells you very little. What matters is which text matches, and why.
High-match passages
Which matches are a real problem and which are fine, such as quotes, references and common phrases.
Close paraphrasing
Patchwriting that keeps the source's structure and wording, even when it is cited.
Missing citations
Ideas, data and definitions that need a reference but don't have one.
Over-quoting
Long or frequent quotations that crowd out your own analysis.
Generic, AI-style wording
Vague openers, unsupported claims and references that can't be verified, which markers often question.
Your AI-use declaration
Whether the way you used AI tools, and how you acknowledge it, fits your module's policy.
What you get back
Guidance that helps you fix the cause, not hide the symptom.
- A plain-English explanation of your similarity report
- Flagged passages, with why each is a problem and how to rework it in your own words
- Citation fixes and a list of any references we could not verify
- A checklist for your AI-use declaration, based on your university's policy
This is almost word for word from a textbook definition. Either quote it with the author, year and page number, or explain it in your own words and cite the source.
This sentence makes a claim with no evidence. Replace it with a specific point from your own reading or data, and cite it.
How it works
Four simple steps, all on UK time.
- 1
Share your files
Upload your brief, marking rubric and draft through the form or WhatsApp, and tell us your deadline.
- 2
Get matched
A UK-qualified expert in your subject reviews your files and confirms the turnaround.
- 3
Receive feedback
You get an annotated copy of your draft plus a prioritised list of what to fix.
- 4
Revise with confidence
You make the changes yourself. Questions about the feedback? Ask your expert.
Who it helps most
- Students with a high similarity score on a draft
- Students unsure what their AI policy allows
- Students who used AI for ideas or grammar and need to declare it
- International students working on paraphrasing
- Dissertation students before final submission
Feedback on your work, never a replacement for it
Every check is designed to help you improve the draft you wrote, in line with UK law and your university's rules.
What we do
- Review the draft you wrote and explain our feedback in plain English
- Show where your work falls short of the brief, rubric or style guide
- Suggest how to improve, with examples and sentence frames you adapt yourself
- Respect your university's academic integrity and AI-use policies
What we don't do
- Write, rewrite or complete any part of your assessed work
- Submit work on your behalf or log in to your university systems
- Guarantee a grade or a similarity score
- Disguise AI-generated text or help bypass detection tools
Other pre-submission checks
Combine checks, or compare all five.
Brief & Rubric Check
Every criterion coveredAn expert maps your draft against every rubric criterion and learning outcome.
Learn more →Referencing Check
Harvard, APA, OSCOLA, MHRAEvery citation and reference checked against your module's style guide.
Learn more →Critical Analysis Review
From description to evaluationParagraph-level feedback that builds argument, evaluation and synthesis.
Learn more →Last-Minute Review
Often within 6–12 hoursA fast, prioritised check of the issues most likely to cost marks.
Learn more →Similarity & AI-Use Review: frequently asked questions
Will this review lower my Turnitin score?
Do you run my work through Turnitin?
Do you "humanise" AI-written assignments?
Can AI detectors be wrong?
Am I allowed to use AI tools at university?
What similarity percentage is acceptable?
Review your similarity report with an expert
Upload your draft, similarity report and your module's AI policy. We will show you what to fix, and how.
